BUT the segment ended with this teaser: how was it possible for the weblogger to point out the odd type face at 8:56 p.m., even before the 60 Minutes II show ended, if the viewer only had a few fleeting seconds to see the images of the documents?
The news clip, then, suggests that the weblogger (whom we all know is the famous Freeper Buckhead) was an insider to the hoax. We need to respond to this suggestion ASAP.
The 60 minutes story was only one segment, and the forgery was so crude that it is easily spotted.
Now,if the VRWC was smart enough to fool Dan Rather with these documents, wouldn't they be smart enough to wait a plausible amount of time before uncovering them?
Either way, the documents were forged.