DAN CAN’T HANDLE THE TRUTH
“Dan Rather is the undisputed head pooh-bah of the news division at CBS. Rather has spent 40 years solidifying his position. His former colleague Bernard Goldberg reports that Mr. Rather is extremely sensitive to criticism from any source. In his book "Bias," Mr. Goldberg quotes CBS News President Andrew Haywood: "Dan can't distinguish between mainstream criticism and criticism coming from the extremists. It's all the same to him." Goldberg writes that in the 1980s there was a vice president at CBS whose unofficial title was "vice president in charge of Dan Rather. "His main job was keeping Dan Rather happy." Little wonder, then, that CBS News refuses to acknowledge the liberal bias that is a staple of CBS News. No one can get through to Dan Rather. He is impervious to criticism.”
http://www.bbhq.com/lonely.htm
Dan Rather’s Liberal Bias
http://ratherbiased.com/news/content/view/145/
http://www.mediaresearch.org/projects/rather20th/welcome.asp
http://www.mediaresearch.org/specialreports/2004/report063004_p1.asp
Joe Wilson verified and Sandy Berger delivered them in his socks from the DNC to CBS.
Jayson Blair.
LOL! Another possible 'verifier' has been exposed at:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1212077/posts
Dan Rather should resign or be fired !!
CBS news should fire Dan Rather for not being absolutely positively certain of the authenticity of these forged documents. We are in the absolute final leg of a Presidential election and Dan Rather rushed to press to get these dociuments on the air because he thought it would potentially help Kerry and hurt Bush. He is blinded by his partisanship and is not fit to be a journalist.
Dan Rather never even looked into where these papers came from. It was his job to be CERTAIN of their authenticity. It's fitting that Rather's career comes to an end under this cloud of his extremist partisanship. He will always be remembered for this. His legacy will be fitting....a reporter who would lie to America if it supported his Left Wing Ideology.
i don't think they were ever vetted at all... i believe SeeBS thought they came form an unimpeachable source so they never bothered to have them checked, period now... just exactly WHO does SeeBS TRUST(and prolly never again)that much???