Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CBS news says No investigation into memos.
Powerlineblog ^ | 09/10/04 | Powerlineblog

Posted on 09/10/2004 11:05:54 AM PDT by Pikamax

UPDATE: CBS News has issued a statement on the fraudulent documents. Bottom line: there will be no investigation.

This report was not based solely on recovered documents, but rather on a preponderance of evidence, including documents that were provided by unimpeachable sources, interviews with former Texas National Guard officials and individuals who worked closely back in the early 1970s with Colonel Jerry Killian and were well acquainted with his procedures, his character and his thinking. In addition, the documents are backed up not only by independent handwriting and forensic document experts but by sources familiar with their content. Contrary to some rumors, no internal investigation is underway at CBS News nor is one planned.

So there you have it: CBS News is walking the plank for the Kerry campaign.

(Excerpt) Read more at powerlineblog.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cbs; investigation; killian; rather; rathergate; selectricgate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-203 next last

1 posted on 09/10/2004 11:05:54 AM PDT by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

Dey zee nuthzing!


2 posted on 09/10/2004 11:08:52 AM PDT by canalabamian (Common sense, unfortunately, is not very common)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

Zey zee nuthzing!


3 posted on 09/10/2004 11:09:00 AM PDT by canalabamian (Common sense, unfortunately, is not very common)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

Wow!


4 posted on 09/10/2004 11:09:08 AM PDT by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
This report was not based solely on recovered documents, but rather on a preponderance of evidence, including documents that were provided by unimpeachable sources, interviews with former Texas National Guard officials and individuals who worked closely back in the early 1970s with Colonel Jerry Killian and were well acquainted with his procedures, his character and his thinking.

Names, CBS. Names.

5 posted on 09/10/2004 11:09:44 AM PDT by dirtboy (Kerry could have left 'Nam within a week if Purple Hearts were awarded for shots to the foot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

6 posted on 09/10/2004 11:09:47 AM PDT by BJungNan (Stop Spam - Do NOT buy from junk email.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

The nice thing about "unimpeachable sources" is that they never have to be checked! Neither do "documents from unimpeachable sources"--they are self authenticating. Nice try, Rather.


7 posted on 09/10/2004 11:10:06 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

CBS is caught between a rock and a hard place. They either admit that they're shills for the dems by pointing to the DNC and Kerry Campaign as the doc source or they stonewall and hope this all goes away. Sux2B them.


8 posted on 09/10/2004 11:10:15 AM PDT by randog (What the....?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

We need to jump all over this. Let them hear us roar. Call them, write them - Let them know we will NOT stand back and watch them lie. Keep up the pressure!!!!!


9 posted on 09/10/2004 11:10:49 AM PDT by msp2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

Name the sources.


10 posted on 09/10/2004 11:10:52 AM PDT by OpusatFR (Let me repeat this: the web means never having to swallow leftist garbage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
including documents that were provided by unimpeachable sources,

Well, that rules out Bill Clinton...

11 posted on 09/10/2004 11:11:56 AM PDT by Steel Wolf (Don't make me roll initiative...!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born to Conserve
My thoughts exactly!

Unbelievable to watch them throw away any pretense of integrity and credibility.

They might as well fire all the so called journalists and let Dan Rather read the New York Times on air (probably, all-the-while complaining of the right-wing press).

12 posted on 09/10/2004 11:12:40 AM PDT by cincinnati65 (Just up the road a piece.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
documents that were provided by unimpeachable sources,

They have others?

13 posted on 09/10/2004 11:12:45 AM PDT by Howlin (What's the Font Spacing, Kenneth?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
unimpeachable sources

On the level of say your hero Bill Clinton Huh Dan.

14 posted on 09/10/2004 11:12:47 AM PDT by federal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
I like how this source says there is an informant with a theory. Oow, I wish I knew someone with at theory!

But the theory is that it was Ben Barnes, which I can believe.
15 posted on 09/10/2004 11:13:06 AM PDT by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

Oh Thank God- I feel so much BETTER now that CBS has assured me that they are right and everyone else is wrong. I was really concerned that making a major news story out of forged docunents would have compromised the already strained integrity of the MSM. And there are so few constants left in this crazy world, that the term "unimpeachable sources" just gives me warm fuzzies all over/sarcasm


16 posted on 09/10/2004 11:13:13 AM PDT by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randog

Yeah - they're really throwing down the gauntlet here. I actually thought they might try to weasel out and admit at least some fault to diffuse the situation. My guess is this lie is so big and extends to high levels, so they must keep the cover.


17 posted on 09/10/2004 11:13:14 AM PDT by over3Owithabrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: msp2004

They don't get it yet.

Old media is the horsewhip and buggy.

New media is the spaceship.


18 posted on 09/10/2004 11:13:22 AM PDT by OpusatFR (Let me repeat this: the web means never having to swallow leftist garbage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
Magic 8-Ball, will CBS stand by its "no investigation" position?

Magic 8-Ball says "I see a flip-flop on the horizon"

19 posted on 09/10/2004 11:13:29 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR
According to Powerline, Dan Rather IS the source :

A half hour ago, Dan Rather went on CNN and said that he knows the Jerry Killian documents to be authentic, and knows that they are not forgeries. Therefore, he said, there will be no retraction, no correction, and -- apparently -- no investigation. The text of the interview is not yet available on CNN's site, but we'll link to it when it becomes available.

What does this mean? Last night, it was reported that senior executives at CBS News were promising an investigation. Today, Dan Rather is personally vouching for the documents' authenticity. This can only mean that Rather himself is the source of the documents. This makes sense; if a staffer on the 60 Minutes payroll had come up with the purported records, the story never would have run without the documents being authenticated. Who has the power to drive this story on to the air without an investigation that would include, for example, contacting Killian's widow, or his son? Dan Rather does.

This would appear to signal the end of Rather's career. If the documents are ultimately accepted as forgeries, which seems inevitable to us, he can't survive. My guess: Rather knows that he will be retiring soon in any event, so as his last public contribution, he is doing whatever he can to elect John Kerry.

20 posted on 09/10/2004 11:14:08 AM PDT by ZGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-203 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson