Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who Were CBS's Sources?
ratherbiased.com ^

Posted on 09/12/2004 7:22:25 AM PDT by dougNYC

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last
To: woodb01

Great info..thanks


61 posted on 09/12/2004 8:52:47 AM PDT by Claire Voyant ((visualize whirled peas))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: dougNYC
There is no longer any question that the CBS documents are fake. That has been proven beyond any reasonable doubt. The only remaining question is ...

WHAT DID DAN RATHER KNOW AND WHEN DID HE KNOW IT?

62 posted on 09/12/2004 8:54:41 AM PDT by Bubba_Leroy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randog

So if only 18% say it would have a negative effect, that means even 50 percent of the Democrat ABB base doesn't care.


63 posted on 09/12/2004 8:54:54 AM PDT by Savage Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: WestTexasWend
Anyone can be "unimpeachable" if they remain anonymous and their evidence is unavailable for review. It's a self-fulfilling prophecy, so to speak.

CBS should be challenged hard on this shaky scheme. If the sources are "unimpeachable", then the evidence will surely survive independent investigation, right? If they refuse, then all they're selling is snakeoil. IIRC, snakeoil salesmen got run out of town on rails, tarred and feathered.

64 posted on 09/12/2004 9:05:05 AM PDT by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace

"If the sources are "unimpeachable", then the evidence will surely survive independent investigation, right?"

Excellent point. I suspect their reticence belies the fact that "unimpeachable" to them would be "laughable" to us.
(Remember...their current document expert's other claim-to-fame is vouching for the Vince Foster suicide note.)


65 posted on 09/12/2004 9:13:44 AM PDT by WestTexasWend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: WestTexasWend

You wrote: "If the sources are "unimpeachable".....

CBS answered that question ... it obviously was not BILL CLINTON.

The question is ... from WHO/WHOM would CBS take documents on face value they were authentic & have an adequate fallback position if they were questioned?


66 posted on 09/12/2004 9:24:03 AM PDT by BlueOx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: BookaT

You wrote:

"So what if he got a DUI in 1976 or whenever. So what if he used to Drink like there is no tomorrow. "

Methinks we should replace

'Bush lied, people died'

with

'Kennedy drank, people SANK!'


67 posted on 09/12/2004 9:44:12 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: dougNYC

You wrote:

"and CBS is going DOWN!"

just like Monica.

When RatherDishonest(TM) comes out with his claims,
we need to answer
"Even Monica Lewinsky wouldn't swallow THAT!"


68 posted on 09/12/2004 9:46:12 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: BlueOx

"... from WHO/WHOM would CBS take documents on face value they were authentic & have an adequate fallback position if they were questioned?"

Good question. Members of the Senate Armed Services Comm. come to mind...Bill Nelson, Hillary!, Ted Kennedy, Robert Byrd (Mccain?). Chris Dodd was in the Air Force and Tom Daschle was a USAF officer. I know it's not his branch, but Ret.Adm. William Crowe would do anything for the dems...he's tag-teaming with Max Cleland on the Kerry tour these days.

Then again, Dan's unimpeachable source could be a janitor in Houston who "found" the "memos" in a dumpster behind Bush 41's house and passed them on to Shiela Jackson Lee.


69 posted on 09/12/2004 9:55:44 AM PDT by WestTexasWend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: randita
I think the use of Marcel Matley (handwriting expert who also affirmed that Vince Foster's suicide note was authentic) is a big tip off to the source. I think someone related to the DNC or to Kerry (or both)

...or, more likely, the clintons...

70 posted on 09/12/2004 10:45:48 AM PDT by Wil H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Savage Rider

Correct.


71 posted on 09/12/2004 10:57:25 AM PDT by randog (What the....?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: WestTexasWend

Then again, Dan's unimpeachable source could be a janitor in Houston who "found" the "memos" in a dumpster behind Bush 41's house and passed them on to Shiela Jackson Lee. **

good one!!!


72 posted on 09/12/2004 12:38:02 PM PDT by BlueOx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Wil H

1. McAuliffe/DNC
2. Kerry Camp
3. Clinton Camp
4. Moonbats (Marty Heldt/Bill Burkett/Etc) via Mapes (Rather Producer)

These are the source to Mapes/Rather.
As to who actually forged them...
(1) Young. College-aged. No experience with typewriters whatsoever. (rules out Heldt and probably Burkett).
(2) Good but not great knowledge about Bush's record. Made the Staudt mistake. (this also probably rules out Heldt).
(3) Probably accessed Heldt's records via the Internet. DoJ should Subpoena Heldt's ISP server logs for IP records. May be too late though--that information usually goes fast. And might be no good even if they had the recrods--these things are huge. Needle in haystack problem.


73 posted on 09/12/2004 12:49:51 PM PDT by tdewey10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: tdewey10

make that possible sources...


74 posted on 09/12/2004 12:50:51 PM PDT by tdewey10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: dougNYC
I just went to the Democratic Underground to see what they were saying. They claim that Hodges was the source and that he is back pedaling because Rove and Bush have threatened him. In addition they claim that Rather has used FOIA to pull the records of both Bush and the other flier who was grounded and found out that the other flier was grounded for using cocaine and that Bush must have been guilty also by association and that he is holding back that information for a later attack. These people are dangerously crazy.
75 posted on 09/12/2004 1:02:11 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson