I have a feeling that Bush will do well in the debates - his answers will be concise while Kerry's will ramble. That alone will make people wonder if Kerry is decisive enough, and indeed if they want an insufferable bore in the White House for 4 years.
Regards, Ivan
1 posted on
09/13/2004 10:32:14 PM PDT by
MadIvan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: Alkhin; agrace; lightingguy; EggsAckley; dinasour; AngloSaxon; Dont Mention the War; Happygal; ...
2 posted on
09/13/2004 10:32:35 PM PDT by
MadIvan
(Gothic. Freaky. Conservative. - http://www.rightgoths.com/)
To: MadIvan
This year Mr Kerry was deemed to have had a similarly successful convention Whatever. The analogy is stretched. Dukakis was a more upfront liberal. Kerry is trying to be an ex-liberal, and has far more characters flaws than Dukakis did. Dukakis was an honest man. Kerry may have his good points, but honestly is not one of them.
3 posted on
09/13/2004 10:35:25 PM PDT by
Torie
To: MadIvan
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!
Wonderful post, hilarious!!!
I'm sitting here in my pjs, wondering if I want to have a beer and read that again! ;-D
4 posted on
09/13/2004 10:35:28 PM PDT by
Judith Anne
(Let's have a FReeper pj party election night!!!)
To: MadIvan
To: MadIvan
I already know what each debate will focus on...and get ready for it because this is their only trump card:
W M D
To: MadIvan
"..his answers will be concise while Kerry's will ramble. That alone will make people wonder if Kerry is decisive enough.."
I can see that happening, since it is very consistant with the styles of both. You can bet Kerry will be drilled into putting out some zingers of his own to compensate for his natural nuanced answers. Bush should be able to do very well if he is himself and does not get baited.
To: MadIvan
Oh ohh - Kerry has "Dukakitis"
11 posted on
09/13/2004 10:40:39 PM PDT by
jporcus
To: MadIvan
Rush today had a remark from the Rev Jackson to the effect that every sentence Kerry utters has three commas.
12 posted on
09/13/2004 10:41:12 PM PDT by
Mike Fieschko
(Did IQs just drop sharply while I was away?)
To: MadIvan
Kerry, like Dukakis, is insufferably wonkish. Mr Dukakis once admitted to having read a couple of volumes on Swedish land-use management while he was on holiday. Mr Kerry speaks to campaign audiences as though he were lecturing them on Swedish land-use management.
Wow. The things you learn here ....
13 posted on
09/13/2004 10:42:00 PM PDT by
gipper81
To: MadIvan
For Mr Kerry ... windsurfing off Nantucket ... even his favourite pastime depends on which way the wind blows.
LOL!
To: MadIvan
Of course, the big difference is that the 2004 campaign is not over yet. Mr Kerrys last chance at redemption may be the presidential debates. This idea that Kerry can somehow salvage his campaign via the debates is pretty silly. People already know George Bush and most people find him to be both likeable and decisive, which would appear to be a pretty good character combo in a time of war.Given that people are already very familiar with George Bush, the only way Kerry can shake peoples' general impression of Bush is if Bush does something completely bizarre at the debates, which ain't going to happen.
To: MadIvan
There is a thread somewhere here with a quote from Kerry at a stump speech where he got away from the script-- and promptly became genuinely obtuse and incoherent.
In the debates he will have carefully scripted comments to be triggered by questions on each subject. He will try to have a few snappy comebacks on predictable points GW will make.
But if GW gets under his skin somehow, and Kerry decides to take off after him on some subject, he is liable to totally embarrass himself. He doesn't do spontaneity well at all.
To: MadIvan
Then again, they may be the opportunity for Mr Kerry to fulfil the Dukakis analogy completely. It was the 1988 debates, and in particular a mind-numbingly passionless answer from the Democrat to a hypothetical question about the rape and murder of his wife, that finished him. Then this one's in the bag. Last I heard, John Kerry doesn't answer "hypothetical questions." He said so in a softball interview with the New York Times over the weekend. No fooling.
24 posted on
09/13/2004 10:55:00 PM PDT by
Prime Choice
(The Log Cabin Republicans AREN'T.)
To: MadIvan
I'm more charitable to Dukakis. He wasn't overly bright, but he never apologized for his beliefs. Kerry on the other hand is a truly contemptible human being. What will finish him in the debates, is his lack of core convictions. Heck, as a candidate he can't even answer "hypothetical" questions with ringing certainty. (laughing)
25 posted on
09/13/2004 10:56:13 PM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: MadIvan
I thought it was this genuine unretouched picture ( Just ask Dan ) of him firing spitballs that is the one hurting Kerry.
28 posted on
09/13/2004 10:58:02 PM PDT by
Nateman
(Rather : I did not have factual relations with the DNC!)
To: MadIvan
Always incisive....nice job good post interesting read
33 posted on
09/13/2004 11:21:41 PM PDT by
jnarcus
To: MadIvan
36 posted on
09/14/2004 12:02:08 AM PDT by
ppaul
To: MadIvan
Noble skipper claims
Everyone else is lying
Watch him crash and burn
38 posted on
09/14/2004 12:25:44 AM PDT by
aruanan
To: MadIvan
The most striking parallel is the way both candidates let their opponents define them in ways that are not politically helpful. Oh for goodness sakes! JF'nK defines himself as a Viet Nam vet every chance he gets. Why can't any freaking media tell the truth?
40 posted on
09/14/2004 12:28:19 AM PDT by
ladyinred
("John Kerry reporting for spitball and typewriter duty.")
To: MadIvan
This year Mr Kerry was deemed to have had a similarly successful convention Ha? Most honest pundits thought the convention was a bust. Most people walked away quoting Walter Mondale, "Where's the Beef?"
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson