1 posted on
09/14/2004 8:00:53 PM PDT by
finnman69
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
To: finnman69
Good work. Another piece in the puzzle.
2 posted on
09/14/2004 8:02:42 PM PDT by
Pete
To: finnman69
I thought this was an intersting piece of forensic analysis that could come in handy.
3 posted on
09/14/2004 8:02:44 PM PDT by
finnman69
(cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
To: finnman69
To: CBS
All your forgeries are belong to us!
4 posted on
09/14/2004 8:02:54 PM PDT by
mattdono
(Chris Matthew is Zell Miller's b*tch! (and the MSM is FR's b*tch!))
To: finnman69
This might explain why the MS Word docs don't match the copied forgeries perfectly, although they already are extremely close to perfect matches.
To: finnman69
Seems to me forging government documents is probably a crime. Isn't it time for the FBI to look into this?
6 posted on
09/14/2004 8:07:29 PM PDT by
Cubs Fan
(Liberals have the inverse midas touch, everything they get a hold of turns to S&*%)
To: finnman69
7 posted on
09/14/2004 8:08:33 PM PDT by
Good.V.Evil
(Eliminate voter fraud=Eliminate demonrats!)
To: finnman69
If done with a "plug-in" filter for a Photoshop-type app (PS, PSP, for example), one can make any image appear as if it was printed on a crumpled piece of paper.
It's simple. It's quick.
It's yet another reason SeeBS is showing how out-of-touch they are, not only with the truth, but with the basics of the digital age in which we live.
It's all reminding me of the Magritte painting of a pipe that reads (in French), "This is not a pipe."
8 posted on
09/14/2004 8:08:34 PM PDT by
Chummy
("I Rather Know when I See BS." RepublicanAttackSquad.biz: "A vote 4 Kerry is a vote for Osama")
To: finnman69
SO the original was crumpled up before it was smoothed out and photo copied? DId someone take it out of a trash can? Was it crumpled up to make it look like it was taken out of a trash can or just to make it look "used"?
11 posted on
09/14/2004 8:10:02 PM PDT by
hoosiermama
(Bush Democrats = Zell's Angels)
To: finnman69
They just forgot to pour tea on it and gnaw at the edges ala Schindler's List with the Blauschein.
12 posted on
09/14/2004 8:11:16 PM PDT by
Snake65
(Osama Bin Decomposing)
To: finnman69
CBS still hasn't said what media they received the forgeries in: printed, faxed, or digital; if digital, what format?
13 posted on
09/14/2004 8:11:43 PM PDT by
Quicksilver
(I finally have a reason to really like Microsoft Word ... and I'm a proud citizen of Jammie Nation.)
To: finnman69
Exactly as some on here predicted had occurred.
Good post.
To: finnman69
The lead expert retained by CBS News to examine disputed memos from President Bush's former squadron commander in the National Guard said yesterday that he examined only the late officer's signature and made no attempt to authenticate the documents themselves.
"There's no way that I, as a document expert, can authenticate them," Marcel Matley said in a telephone interview from San Francisco. The main reason, he said, is that they are "copies" that are "far removed" from the originals.
To: finnman69
21 posted on
09/14/2004 8:16:16 PM PDT by
Jorge
To: finnman69
Ok. Now were talking 'Shroud of Turin'.
Quick - someone look at the negative image of this.
22 posted on
09/14/2004 8:16:55 PM PDT by
kidd
To: finnman69
Please check the document for Sandy Berger DNA. Secretary says Army speak used in docs.
To: finnman69
There's another interesting point here that I haven't seen anyone comment on. Try this one at home, kids!
Sign your name, print, or type something, whatever, on a sheet of paper. Take a black magic marker and line through it. Then make a photocopy of that document, or, to be more true to form, go through fifteen generations of copying. Hold the two up to the light. On the original, it's VERY easy to see the original information you marked out. On the final copy, though, it's impossible, because the photocopier only picks up the black mark, not the underlying writing.
This to me is incredibly damning evidence against CBS. They can't produce original documents because there aren't any.
They did up a MS Word document, photocopied it fifteen or twenty times, crumpled it up, and THEN blacked out the pertinent information. Otherwise, the info would NOT be visible through the blackout. It's physically impossible.
27 posted on
09/14/2004 8:21:46 PM PDT by
Terabitten
(Live as a bastion of freedom and democracy in the midst of the heart of darkness.)
To: finnman69
Yep...and if you look in the right hand corner, it appears that someone wiped their posterior with it. That's about all it's worth.
29 posted on
09/14/2004 8:29:06 PM PDT by
edpc
To: finnman69
Hmmm ... interesting.
It looks more to me like the paper had been sat on. Maybe one or more put into an 8 by 11 manilla envelope and put on the driver's seat while he or she drove to work.
Right under the signature ... that's fart deflection if I ever saw it !
33 posted on
09/14/2004 8:37:07 PM PDT by
knarf
(A place where anyone can learn anything ... especially that which promotes clear thinking.)
To: finnman69
I?ll bet that if the real printed originals of these documents ever turn up (say, in a dumpster behind MoveOn.org headquarters), they?ll find the idiot?s fingerprints on them. I'm sure the original was shredded.
To: NYC GOP Chick; Buckhead
36 posted on
09/14/2004 8:41:17 PM PDT by
finnman69
(cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson