[seenenuf]

Re Dreier v. my comment re money orders; my intent was to
express a surer way to stop illegal immigration. sacrificing either a Dem or a Pub, by hysterically influencing voters, is only temporary - maybe one election.
Whereas, if you stop the incentive to come and then take/send the money away from our economy - we have fixed the original lure. Stopping the flow of money, by
ILLEGALs, out of our economy would help to fix the original problem, i.e., we're going broke supporting the old folks left behind in Mexico. We'd keep more money in circulation and maybe the illegals would stay home and try to fix their country.

[PeoplesRep_of_LA]

Sure, but WHO is going to stop such actions. In case you haven't noticed, its a dark time in American history on this issue, we simply have no honest representation in Washington. I have never seen such bipartisan corruption on a single issue in my life, other than Congressional pay raises.

[kingu]

Whereas, if you stop the incentive to come and then take/send the money away from our economy - we have fixed the original lure. Stopping the flow of money, by ILLEGALs, out of our economy would help to fix the original problem, i.e., we're going broke supporting the old folks left behind in Mexico.

Even with the fire to Dreier's toes, he still voted to do exactly what you don't want: to make it easier for people to send money out of the country using matricular cards. I've defended my congressman, David Dreier, on here many, many, many times. In the primary I voted for Soto, and in the general, unless Soto comes back as a write in, I'm voting for the lady with the (D) after her name.