Leave it to a blogger, who is not in his jammies, but is serving his country in Afghanistan, to do the job of journalists. My husband keeps saying that the MSM doesn't even try to understand how the army works.
If you husband is serving or served, give him my thanks.
All these threads and blogger entries have given me more of an education in the different branches than I (who never served) ever thought I'd have.
Jonah Goldberg of NR's
The Corner put up an email from a USAF Captain, because of this:
LtCol from NORAD on Fox.
There are comments at the
Castle Argghhh! blog.
Part of the Captain's email follows:
The sad part is that no one around him, from the producers, cameramen, et al. was savvy enough on the military to catch the problem prior to airtime. Im not exonerating the colonel, but anyone who has served would (almost instinctively) have noticed the upside-down insignia. If someone did notice and chose to allow an officer of the United States to appear in that manner, the only word I could find for that choice is reprehensible. Mind you, Im not ascribing malice toward the United States military to anyone, but I do realize it has been known to exist in some circles of the Fourth Estate.
Id feel a bit better if the so-called military correspondents could learn the difference between self-propelled artillery and tanks (which have significantly different military utility), would know the rank structure well enough to address sergeants-major as Sergeant Major rather than Sergeant (which the newest of recruits understands by Day 2 of basic training, along with all the other forms of address from Private to Mr. President), and that the rifles fired at a military funeral are not a 21-gun salute, but are from an older tradition of firing three volleys over a grave to signify the conclusion of a battlefield truce to succor the wounded and bury the dead. The press tries to hire science reporters with some science background to help explain stories to the non-scientist public, but when it comes to covering those of us sworn to defend the nation, the media organizations send reporters who couldnt readily identify an A-10 and an F-15 if they were standing next to them. Nor do those reporters seem to care to research the issues beforehand. After all, they could learn most of what they wanted to know just by going online and reading the fact sheets from the service Web pages. I guess immersing themselves in a military history course or interviewing content, professional soldiers to gain background information just isnt as satisfying as spending a (well-publicized after the fact) weekend sleeping on the streets to truly understand the homeless question.