To: Shryke
Creationists seem to think that critiquing an article is the same as censoring it.
18 posted on
09/17/2004 8:30:55 AM PDT by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: Doctor Stochastic
Yes. You'll notice MA did not address that question at all in his response.
19 posted on
09/17/2004 8:34:32 AM PDT by
Shryke
(Never retreat. Never explain. Get it done and let them howl.)
To: Doctor Stochastic
Creationists seem to think that critiquing an article is the same as censoring it.Well, you guys seem to think that putting a label in a book is introducing religion into schools. But you are wrong in your assertion. Critique involves actually answering the substance of an argument. NCSE attacks not the substance but the existence of an argument.
35 posted on
09/17/2004 9:11:15 AM PDT by
AndrewC
(I also think that Carthage should be destroyed. - Cato)
To: Doctor Stochastic
Why didn't the article publish Meyer's abstract and excerpts from the paper so we could judge for ourselves?
(yeah, I know, rhetorical question)
56 posted on
09/17/2004 10:32:40 AM PDT by
RightWingAtheist
(<A HREF=http://www.michaelmoore.com>disingenuous filmmaker</A>)
To: Doctor Stochastic; Alamo-Girl; marron; AndrewC; unspun; -YYZ-
Creationists seem to think that critiquing an article is the same as censoring it. One more time, Doc: ID is not Creationism. Creationism takes Genesis as the foundation of a new kind of science. ID works within the framework of already existing, established science.
Why does the word "design" give you such heebie-jeebies?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson