Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: counterpunch
I agree with you in technical concept - however - any theory on how the OCR did such a fine job copying the handwritten signitures? How about superscripts?

Did the lying Democrap make even the slightest attempt to prove this thoery?

These Democrats are buffoons.

Diva's Husband

102 posted on 09/17/2004 6:00:28 PM PDT by Diva Betsy Ross (It's not Bush's fault... it's the media's fault!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Diva Betsy Ross
any theory on how the OCR did such a fine job copying the handwritten signitures? How about superscripts?

The mission was to have damning evidence but the master doc did not contain enough 'evidence". So the page was scanned, or one similar to what they wanted so they had a "format" and some language; maybe even a real ANG/Killian one.

So you scan what you have to work with, make your content changes. Now you have a Times Roman word doc. Sloppiness make two kinds of "ths". Some scanned like the typewriter and any additions or corrections made a superscript. You print it out, paste on a copy of the real signature and xerox it 15 times.

115 posted on 09/17/2004 8:23:14 PM PDT by turbocat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson