Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/18/2004 2:41:25 AM PDT by elhombrelibre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last
To: elhombrelibre

Bump


2 posted on 09/18/2004 2:43:40 AM PDT by Jet Jaguar (Who would the terrorists vote for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: elhombrelibre; Pokey78

He noticed us!

STEYN BUMP


3 posted on 09/18/2004 2:44:36 AM PDT by stands2reason (Limousine Liberal--a man who has his cake, eats his cake, and complains that other people have cake.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: elhombrelibre

bump for great read


4 posted on 09/18/2004 2:45:03 AM PDT by ArmyBratproud (all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: elhombrelibre
So why aren't they? The only reasonable conclusion is that the source -- or trail of sources -- is even more incriminating than the fake documents. Why else would Heyward and Rather allow the CBS news division to commit slow, public suicide?

There's the question, indeed.

7 posted on 09/18/2004 2:51:03 AM PDT by Sabatier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: elhombrelibre
...the over-the-top intros: ''Bob Schieffer, one of the best hard-nosed reporters in the business, has been working his sources. What have you managed to uncover for us, Bob?'', after which Bob reads out a DNC press release.

Priceless! Hey, Freedude, FYI, it is customary to put Mark Steyn's name in the title, like so:

Mark Steyn: CBS Defense of Rather Hints at Bigger Story

That way, we'll all know to click on the link.

9 posted on 09/18/2004 2:51:56 AM PDT by stands2reason (Limousine Liberal--a man who has his cake, eats his cake, and complains that other people have cake.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: elhombrelibre
after you and your money-no-object resources-a-go-go ''60 Minutes'' crew

That's a good description.

11 posted on 09/18/2004 2:54:29 AM PDT by South40 (Amnesty for ILLEGALS is a slap in the face to the USBP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: elhombrelibre

''You have sat too long for any good you have been doing. Depart, I say; and let us have done with you. In the name of God, go!''

Great Steyn read!


12 posted on 09/18/2004 2:56:27 AM PDT by MEG33 (John Kerry has been AWOL on issues of national security for two decades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: elhombrelibre
Absolutely delicious stuff! Steyn is my hero.

Things are finally starting to heat up, baby!

13 posted on 09/18/2004 2:58:13 AM PDT by jporcus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: elhombrelibre
So why aren't they? The only reasonable conclusion is that the source -- or trail of sources -- is even more incriminating than the fake documents. Why else would Heyward and Rather allow the CBS news division to commit slow, public suicide?

Indeed!

14 posted on 09/18/2004 2:59:46 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: elhombrelibre

I got a chuckle of out of Mark Steyn's Oliver Cromwell tag line. However, I beg to differ with him. I want Danron to stay right where he is, so we remember who liberals are. If he goes we learn nothing from this entire sorry episode. There are good reasons to have him around, the principal one being Danron is a living exhibit of what liberalism has become today. I say for the sake of America, keep him at CBS!!!


15 posted on 09/18/2004 3:01:51 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: elhombrelibre
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Forget about Rather. He is totally discredited now. Lets trackdown the sources.
16 posted on 09/18/2004 3:05:53 AM PDT by igoramus987
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: elhombrelibre
You'd think CBS would be mad as hell to find whoever it was who stitched them up and made them look idiots. So why aren't they? The only reasonable conclusion is that the source -- or trail of sources -- is even more incriminating than the fake documents. Why else would Heyward and Rather allow the CBS news division to commit slow, public suicide?

Just as Watergate led not only to CReEP but to the FBI and CIA, Rathergate leads no doubt to the DNC, the Kerry campaign and CBS and Viacom top management with tentacles into other media corporations. There are ten Pulitzers waiting for the inside whistle blower, assuming he also brings down the communist Pulitzer committee.
17 posted on 09/18/2004 3:06:00 AM PDT by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: elhombrelibre
....Hel-looooo? Earth to the Lost Planet of Ratheria: You can't ''break that story.'' A guy called ''Buckhead'' did that, on the Free Republic Web site a couple of hours after you ..........

Bump!

18 posted on 09/18/2004 3:07:08 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: elhombrelibre

That's gonna sting. Fantastic article!


20 posted on 09/18/2004 3:11:33 AM PDT by Tom_Busch (Vote Bush/Cheney in 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: elhombrelibre

It really seems now that the most sensational, lurid, and damningly partisan theory for the provenance of the forgeries is the correct one: they originated with a lunatic in Texas, but they came to Rather from the DNC and John Kerry is directly involved.
Revealing this now would destroy whatever slight chance Kerry still has of a comeback, and possibly lead to the first pre-election withdrawal by a major party Presidential candidate in American history.
Rather and CBS do not want to go down in history for this. Not only would their fellow lefties curse them to the dying breath of liberalism, but they would become a laughingstock till the end of time. A thousand years from now, "rather" might be a common lower-case noun for a pompous incompetent who misses some obvious flaw in his plans.


22 posted on 09/18/2004 3:14:32 AM PDT by atomic conspiracy (This message prepared with MS-CBS Word 72 software)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: elhombrelibre
Or as the New York Times' headline put it: ''Memos On Bush Are Fake But Accurate.''

Did they really write that?

23 posted on 09/18/2004 3:17:00 AM PDT by beyond the sea (Free Martha Mitchell......... and Jail Teraaaaaayza - let them run around naked, at least the kids)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: elhombrelibre

The only reasonable conclusion is that the source -- or trail of sources -- is even more incriminating than the fake documents. Why else would Heyward and Rather allow the CBS news division to commit slow, public suicide?

I think that you hit the nail on the head with this one.


24 posted on 09/18/2004 3:17:05 AM PDT by garylmoore (Repeat: They made a mistake, they didn't count of George W. Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: elhombrelibre

The only reasonable conclusion is that the source -- or trail of sources -- is even more incriminating than the fake documents. Why else would Heyward and Rather allow the CBS news division to commit slow, public suicide?

I think that you hit the nail on the head with this one.


25 posted on 09/18/2004 3:17:08 AM PDT by garylmoore (Repeat: They made a mistake, they didn't count of George W. Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: elhombrelibre

The only reasonable conclusion is that the source -- or trail of sources -- is even more incriminating than the fake documents. Why else would Heyward and Rather allow the CBS news division to commit slow, public suicide?

I think that you hit the nail on the head with this one.


26 posted on 09/18/2004 3:17:11 AM PDT by garylmoore (Repeat: They made a mistake, they didn't count of George W. Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: elhombrelibre
So why aren't they? The only reasonable conclusion is that the source -- or trail of sources -- is even more incriminating than the fake documents. Why else would Heyward and Rather allow the CBS news division to commit slow, public suicide?

It's either a Kerry connection they are protecting or, God forbid, could Dan's daughter be involved?

27 posted on 09/18/2004 3:19:48 AM PDT by beyond the sea (Free Martha Mitchell......... and Jail Teraaaaaayza - let them run around naked, at least the kids)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson