Hey Rich -- the difference is Begala and Carville have ALWAYS been Democratic Campaigners as hosts of the Clinton News Network.
And btw -- Crowley and Mossbacher DO NOT work for Dubya's Campaign, do they?
But to make things fair, Fox should do away with Hannity and Colmes, and instead couple Ollie North with Ann Coulter.
Now THAT might a Crossfire equivolent.
Rich and O'Reilly share a common trait. To them, its me, myself, I, and then theres the rest of the 'far right'.
The column Rich wrote after our Presidents speech at the Republican Convention was the craziest thing I have read in my entire life.....NUTZ!!....so me, being me I went to the NYT forum for him and told him so....I was beaten to DEATH over there, by such irrational comments and slurs I gave up after posting about 100 times hahahahahahhahahaa....these losers dont care what they say or post, they come off to themselves as having won over what you have said ... they are arrogant and delusional and DANGEROUS .. I got a thing about the new lineup coming on Public Radio.. I've written them probably a gazllion times ( gazllion Lib word ) since President Bush was elected, both when they write me for money and just when Im ticked off.....seems THEY are FINALLY listening and I think it has to do with MONEY!!
Besides, they were absolutely right about New York magazine. When I heard about the plans to do a photo spread on New York Republicans, I knew it was a bad idea. A few months ago, New York magazine had a picture of Rush Limbaugh on the cover regarding celebrity scandals, and they picked a 10-year-old, fat, unflattering picture of him, while all the rest of the celebs on the cover had good pictures of them.
Anyhow, the Repubs were justifiably outraged about the pics New York magazine took. They were so unflattering they looked like mug shots, for goodness sakes. New York magazine never prints unflattering photographs of anyone unless they are Republicans. If that isn't bias, I don't know what is.