Unless the person who made up the docs was someone who has had the job of putting together paperwork, they are more likely to screw up details than they are to get them all correct. I agree, but does that injure or help my thesis?Neutral?
Lack of redaction on USAT's copies of the one document says to me someone noticed that the doc had the wrong address, but they couldn't fix it, cuz it had already been sent to other people. They tried to cover it up by blacking it out, hoping no one would notice it.
Sounds reasonable to me, whoever did it was not familiar with FOIA docs as the first blacked out copy has to be copied to be unreadable or the ink must be thoroughly dry and re-blacked out a second time.,.
I would like to see someone try to interview USAT about what they know, cuz they were sent the same forged documents too.
I agree ..they have been a little quiet as of late..
I don't think Burkett would be more likely to get it wrong or right than a dem operative, cuz either would likely look at some kind of "sample" to kinda copy the format. I think they copied from something more recent, cuz some of the format changes from the 70's compared to something more recent would account for some of the "errors". Burkett didn't retire until 1999 & he was in the branch of service that the style more closely resembled.
I think the only thing that is provable about who's fingers were on the keys, is they were done by an amateur forger.