To: jhouston
Later, Bartlett would explain why he did not challenge the documents with a question: "How am I supposed to verify something that came from a dead man in three hours?" As us. We did it.
4 posted on
09/18/2004 7:32:16 PM PDT by
js1138
(Speedy architect of perfect labyrinths.)
To: js1138
Half an hour later, Roberts called "60 Minutes" producer Mary Mapes with word that Bartlett was not challenging the authenticity of the documents.I take it Roberts isn't a poker player.
13 posted on
09/18/2004 7:39:46 PM PDT by
Howlin
(What's the Font Spacing, Kenneth?)
To: js1138
14 posted on
09/18/2004 7:40:56 PM PDT by
rocksblues
(Sorry John, we remember and will never forget your treason!)
To: js1138
How am I supposed to verify something that came from a dead man in three hours? Kerry was able to deny the validity of "Unfit for Command" without reading a page of it.
To: js1138
We're collectively better at most everything than the WH staff.
24 posted on
09/18/2004 7:48:19 PM PDT by
GraniteStateConservative
(...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
To: js1138
As us. We did it. Not exactly a fair comparison.
If this had been a national security issue, it may have been possible.
This was a political issue and if our President had used government resources to comment on it he would have been guilty of converting government money for his own personal use.
I don't think the intellectual power and speed of the internet has been recognized by anyone but daily participants in the phenomenon.
To: js1138
But we did not verify this singlehandedly, of our own knowledge. It was done collectively, though a database consisting of the experience of many lives, a wealth of knowledge not then available to Bartlett.
110 posted on
09/18/2004 8:58:37 PM PDT by
Fatuncle
(Do you suppose the Dixie Chicks will admit that they are ashamed of Dan Rather being from Texas?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson