Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DixieOklahoma

They can't spike electronic machines, for sure. But can they hack the results??

Fund's book says YES, big time.


23 posted on 09/19/2004 12:06:47 AM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Travis McGee
They can't spike electronic machines, for sure. But can they hack the results??

The butterfly ballot has to be replaced by something that will only accept one vote per person. It's keeping Democrat party alive.
In NY, we flick a switch. You only get to do it once.

Then there's the absentee. There has to be away to verify the people are real, not dead, citizens, and they only get one per voter.

So far, electronic seems to be the best bet, but somehow it has to be secured. That's the biggie.

32 posted on 09/19/2004 12:18:56 AM PDT by concerned about politics ( Liberals are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Travis McGee

Nothing is 'hackable' unless it has a Modem hooked up to it. Now there is probably the possibility that an election supervisor could go in there and change the votes but that would probably be somewhat difficult, when the votes appear instantly.


37 posted on 09/19/2004 12:30:10 AM PDT by DixieOklahoma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Travis McGee; Joe Brower
There was a recent thread about electronic vote theft. Here ya go: Diebold GEMS central tabulator contains a stunning security hole
64 posted on 09/19/2004 8:36:16 AM PDT by Living Stone (Turn right and go straight. Keep going. You'll get there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson