[G.Mason]

"Until the GOP leadership has the willpower to do something about this, talk about fraud is just so much whining..."

Why of course!

You wouldn't want to get your hands dirty by volunteering to help watch the polls, would you?

Who's whining?

[Agrarian]

If it were as simple as poll-watching, the GOP would mobilize an army of poll-watchers, and then the problem would be fixed -- no more fraud. I have donated generously to virtually every Republican running to serve or represent me, and to a few who aren't -- I'm on the mailing lists...

Polls don't need watching around my parts, so I'm assuming that either the other places are all covered this year (in which case there won't be any fraud), or the GOP is afraid of the political fall-out from trying to combat fraud.

Who I call the whiners are the ones who keep claiming that if it weren't for fraud, Bush "really" won the 2000 popular vote. One guy even went so far as to claim that even calculating in the Nader effect, Bush STILL actually won the vote against the liberals. I find such talk off-putting. If you're out watching polls and personally fighting fraud... bloviate away -- I take my cowboy hat off to you, and will shut up...

[rmmcdaniell]

You wouldn't want to get your hands dirty by volunteering to help watch the polls, would you?

Who's whining?

Plenty of poll watchers observed rampant fraud in the '02 South Dakota Senate race. However in the end its the candidate that has to file the court challenges. The spineless republicans are just too pussy to do so and let the rats get away every time.