scratch what I said, here is a NYT article explaining that CBS admits it was misled, this must be drudge's source: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/20/politics/campaign/20guard.html
I apologize for my THIRD post but now I'm wondering who the heck is Dan Rather's supposed UNIMPEACHABLE SOURCE. How is dan going to explain how absolutely sure he was about the story, after going on and on about how this story was so exhaustively vetted, just like every other CBS story is, exhaustively double checked and confirmed, blah blah...
What a collapse of credibility.