Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Willie Green
From the article: ...Secretary of Labor Elaine Chao opens the report by proclaiming, “America´s workers are the most dynamic and productive in the world. They are the backbone of the American economy, which is constantly evolving and producing new jobs and new opportunities.” This tribute to the American worker sounds good, but has not been matched by policy. Indeed, the Bush Administration in general and Secretary Chao in particular have shown no interest in advancing the living standards of employees. And in the matter of job opportunities, President Bush will be going into the election as the first president since Herbert Hoover at the onset of the Great Depression to see the number of Americans working actually decline during his term in office.

Secretary Chao´s background may have suited her to manage a large organization like the DoL, but not to make policy...

So Willie; set me straight over here. It's policy that creates jobs? Also, just where does a 5.4% unemployment rate fit in with the historical unemployment rate?

It's funny, but I'm not hearing that "giant sucking sound" that the protectionist talks about...well that's not quite true, I do sort of hear those last gasps of restricted breath that you (and other like you) let out in that "race to the bottom" of your barrel-scrapping arguments.

7 posted on 09/20/2004 2:52:58 PM PDT by LowCountryJoe ("How the Far Right Has Been Left [and] Behind" - PJB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: LowCountryJoe

Policy can effect the creation of jobs. If you do not believe that is true, then you are denying the underlying premise of supply side economics.

And if you do not hear a giant sucking sound, I take it you have not recently spoken with a customer service or technical support operator recently.


9 posted on 09/20/2004 3:08:18 PM PDT by radicalamericannationalist (The Convention convinced me. 4 MORE YEARS!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: LowCountryJoe
Answer to where does 5.4% unemployment fit in historical perspective:

Overall Unemployment Rate in the Civilian Labor Force, 1920 - 2004

Year Rate
1920 5.2 %
1928 4.2
1930 8.7
1932 23.6
1934 21.7
1936 16.9
1938 19.0
1940 14.6
1942 4.7
1944 1.2
1946 3.9%
1948 3.8
1950 5.3
1952 3.0
1954 5.5
1956 4.1
1958 6.8
1960 5.5
1962 5.5
1964 5.2
1966 3.8%
1968 3.6
1970 4.9
1972 5.6
1974 5.6
1976 7.7
1978 6.1
1980 7.1
1982 9.7
1984 7.5
1986 7.0%
1987 6.2
1988 5.5
1989 5.3
1990 5.6
1991 6.8
1992 7.5
1993 6.9
1994 6.1
1995 5.6
1996 5.4%
1997 4.9
1998 4.5
1999 4.2
2000 4.0
2001 4.8
2002 5.8
2003 6.0
   
   
2004  
 Jan. 5.6%
 Feb. 5.6
 March 5.7
 April 5.6
 May 5.6
 June 5.6
 July 5.5
 August 5.4
</TABLE

60 posted on 10/01/2004 2:23:52 PM PDT by FairWitness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson