[null and void]

As a Libertarian, I signed an agreement that I do not advocate the initiation of force.

I didn't agree to not respond to force.

Nor did I sign a suicide pact.

Why is the party unable to recognize 9/11 as an initiation of force, and advocate responding appropriately, i.e. kill those who mean us ill first?

BTW, I'm no longer a "card carrying" Libertarian...

[Cultural Jihad]

Why is the party unable to recognize 9/11 as an initiation of force, and advocate responding appropriately, i.e. kill those who mean us ill first?

Well, you would have to ask the humanist standard-bearer of the L.P. for the past 2 elections why he claimed on September 12th that the U.S. deserved to be attacked.

[Commie Basher]

I do not advocate the initiation of force. I didn't agree to not respond to force. ... Why is the party unable to recognize 9/11 as an initiation of force, and advocate responding appropriately,

Because Bush has not responded "appropriately."

Why are Bush supporters unable to realize that an initiation of force by individuals (which 9/11 was) does not grant one the right to "respond" against an unrelated wish list of nations, much less against an entire religion or people (as some FReepers seem eager to do.)