Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Memo lawyer is party activist
Washington Times ^ | Wednesday, September 22, 2004 | By Rowan Scarborough

Posted on 09/22/2004 12:51:16 AM PDT by JohnHuang2

The Washington Times
www.washingtontimes.com

Memo lawyer is party activist

By Rowan Scarborough
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
Published September 22, 2004

The attorney for the man who leaked discredited memos to CBS News' Dan Rather is a Democratic Party activist in Texas who has vowed to defeat what he says is a White House "master plan" for "a one-party America."
    David Van Os, a San Antonio lawyer and defender of retired Texas Air National Guard Lt. Col. Bill Burkett's role in supplying forged memos detrimental to President Bush, has held a number of local party posts, including chairman of the Travis County Democratic Party.
    Mr. Van Os referred to the suspect memos this way in a Sept. 15 e-mail to reporters: "What difference would it make" if "someone in the year 2004 had prepared on a word processor replicas of documents that they believed had existed in 1972 or 1973?"
    He did not respond yesterday to a telephone message or to questions in an e-mail to his law office.
    Mr. Van Os served in Austin, the Travis County seat, as party chairman from 1996 to 1998, and also served as chairman of the North East Bexar County Democrats in San Antonio from 2000 to 2003.

(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: billburkett; burkett; cbs; cbsnews; danrather; davidvanos; democrats; memogate; rather; rathergate; vanos

1 posted on 09/22/2004 12:51:16 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

Glad to see someone is paying attention to the lawyer. I think he may be more involved in this than people think.


2 posted on 09/22/2004 12:56:58 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
I guess his running for Chair of the State Democratic Party isn't important either. /s
Texas Democrats Elect San Marcos Lawyer New State Party Chairman
Clay Robison.
Knight Ridder Tribune Business News.
Washington: Oct 26, 2003. pg. 1

Oct. 26--AUSTIN, Texas--Charles Soechting, a lawyer from San Marcos, won the Texas Democratic Party's top job Saturday and vowed to lead the struggling party in an aggressive comeback against Republican officeholders.

(snip)

Soechting's election, which required a majority of the 64-member committee, took two ballots. On the first, he led Mauro, 28-22.

Malcolm abstained from voting for her successor, and the remaining 13 votes were split among state Rep. Garnet Coleman, D- Houston, committee member Mary Moore of Bryan and lawyer David Van Os of San Antonio.


3 posted on 09/22/2004 1:05:53 AM PDT by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple

Agree -- my guess is we've seen only the tip of the iceberg so far.


4 posted on 09/22/2004 1:44:05 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

So can someone explain to me how a retired TANG officer can afford a lawyer like Van Os????


5 posted on 09/22/2004 1:49:09 AM PDT by Tempest (Don't blame me, I'm voting for Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tempest

bump


6 posted on 09/22/2004 2:08:52 AM PDT by Tempest (Don't blame me, I'm voting for Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tempest

Good question. Or is Van Os working pro bono...and if so, why?


7 posted on 09/22/2004 3:44:09 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
"What difference would it make" if "someone in the year 2004 had prepared on a word processor replicas of documents that they believed had existed in 1972 or 1973?"
In other words, what difference would it make if I used a word processor in 2004 to write that you are a pedophile (from documents I believe existed in 1973?

RATS are insane. It is indeed a mental disorder! Do they hear themselves speak or are they too far gone?

8 posted on 09/22/2004 3:51:18 AM PDT by Libertina (Thank God we have President Bush in the White House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple

9 posted on 09/22/2004 9:46:07 AM PDT by GOPcapitalist (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tempest
So can someone explain to me how a retired TANG officer can afford a lawyer like Van Os????

Damage control. Having a well-connected Dem like Van Os on the scene and making all the polished statements for Burkett to the press keeps the Democrat Party in the driver's seat as opposed to Burkett going out on his own and shooting his mouth off.

10 posted on 09/22/2004 9:48:34 AM PDT by GOPcapitalist (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple

Pro Bono? Burkett hasn't even been charged with anything. I don't know of any lawyer willing to work for free just because of the specter of a possible criminal trial.


11 posted on 09/22/2004 10:07:53 AM PDT by Tempest (Don't blame me, I'm voting for Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson