Skip to comments.
US expert sketches nightmare nuclear terrorist attack on major city
AFP ^
| Wed, Sep 22, 2004
Posted on 09/22/2004 10:06:51 AM PDT by Area Freeper
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-184 next last
To: mugs99
You are joking, right? The UN will cease to exist.
UN now is anti-American organization. Should US decide to leave UN, nobody would cry about it.
Israel will conquer the Mideast.
Israel had never wanted and never will conquer any country, although it has capabilities. Japan will become allied with South Korea and conquer the north. China will be defeated by Taiwan with US and Russian help.
Say what? Why?
I'll give you my scenario:
1.US in the economical crisis which is the deepest and most destructive in it's history.
2.World goes down together with US.
3.Islamic imperialists overthrow berely-holding ME governments in Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Pakistan (!).
4.Iran engage in Iraq against US troops full-scale.
5.Pakistan attacks India with nuclear weapon. India responded.
6.Full scale oil blackmail of West on behalf of countries who's new governments support pan-Islamic war.
7.Democrats blame Bush for everything.
8.Homosexuals demand right to marry legally.
Enough?
To: mugs99
The UN will cease to exist. Ground Zero?
42
posted on
09/22/2004 11:34:38 AM PDT
by
Doomonyou
(Molon Labe! FMCDH!)
To: Neocon Shavuz
8.Homosexuals demand right to marry legally. That's it, we're doomed.
43
posted on
09/22/2004 11:35:41 AM PDT
by
Doomonyou
(Molon Labe! FMCDH!)
To: Doomonyou
Check out this web site, these guys are fighting the good fight:
www.aclj.org
Soldiers
44
posted on
09/22/2004 11:44:04 AM PDT
by
Bald Eagle777
(The only way to fight terrorism is to exterminate all of the terrorists..)
To: Shryke
She said the "raw material for nuclear terrorism is housed in hundreds of facilities in dozens of countries and inadequately secured."Your statement (that you quoted) wasn't the only example of exaggeration. To make a bomb easily, you need enriched uranium, and that is not available all over the place. To make a plutonium bomb, you need a much more complicated device.
Maybe she's trying to sell a book.
45
posted on
09/22/2004 11:47:02 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
("Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown" -- harpseal)
To: Robe
One could trigger a nuclear event just by pushing two sub critical masses together...then boom Sorry, that's wrong. You'd get a criticality which would be like some C4 going off and a nice blue flash .... but not a BIG BOOM.
You need to explosively compress the mass into a supercriticality and feed it more neutrons.
46
posted on
09/22/2004 11:54:13 AM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(Truth, Justice and the Texan Way)
To: Neocon Shavuz
And dogs and cats living together ... MASS HYSTERIA
All right ENOUGH, I get the picture. What if you're wrong?
If I'm wrong, we go to jail, peacefully, quietly, we'll enjoy it. But if I'm right and we can stop this thing ? Lenny, you will have saved the lives of millions of REGISTERED VOTERS.
47
posted on
09/22/2004 11:58:02 AM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(Truth, Justice and the Texan Way)
To: Bald Eagle777
Here's another one:
Mrs. Doomonyou and I are going to a fundraiser this weekend in Sacramento.
http://www.pacificjustice.org/index.cfm
48
posted on
09/22/2004 12:00:32 PM PDT
by
Doomonyou
(Molon Labe! FMCDH!)
To: Area Freeper
49
posted on
09/22/2004 12:01:05 PM PDT
by
dennisw
(Gd is against Amelek for all generations.)
To: Doomonyou
50
posted on
09/22/2004 12:04:41 PM PDT
by
Bald Eagle777
(The only way to fight terrorism is to exterminate all of the terrorists..)
To: Area Freeper
51
posted on
09/22/2004 12:06:49 PM PDT
by
Fiddlstix
(This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
To: Doomonyou
think Chernobyl, only 1000 times worse.WHOA! I don't think that is true at ALL. Chernobyl was an exposed, huge nuclear core. No WAY would ground zero be "hotter" - it couldn't be. Most of the nuclear material would be blown away.
52
posted on
09/22/2004 12:08:04 PM PDT
by
Shryke
(Never retreat. Never explain. Get it done and let them howl.)
To: Area Freeper
A trained nuclear engineer using material the size of an orange could build an atomic bomb to fit into a van, proliferation expert Laura Holgate said, Oh? Proliferating something for sure.
53
posted on
09/22/2004 12:09:55 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty and establish property rights)
To: Shryke
Most of the nuclear material would be blown away. Where? I'm not sure which way the wind blows on the east coast, but anywhere but out to sea would afferct millions.
54
posted on
09/22/2004 12:10:22 PM PDT
by
Doomonyou
(Molon Labe! FMCDH!)
To: Shryke
You gotta look at the bright side of things. The blast will likely go off in a
blue state. Because of the catastrophic loss of life, they'll lose at least one House member after the following census. We'll solidify our control of Congress.
(Or maybe I've been freeping too long.}
55
posted on
09/22/2004 12:14:37 PM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(I'm PatrickHenry and I approve this message.)
To: Doomonyou
Not really. The blast itself not only turns a portion of the material into energy, but basically throws the rest of it all over the place, as particles. This would definitely have an effect on the biosphere, but remember that the core of a fission weapon is rather small. It's not that much hazardous material, spread out over thousands (maybe millions) of square miles. Higher cancer rates near ground zero, perhaps slight increases in outlying areas. We wouldn't have hordes of mutants, though. Chernobyl was entirely different. That sucker was irradiating steam and weather like crazy (IIRC).
56
posted on
09/22/2004 12:17:27 PM PDT
by
Shryke
(Never retreat. Never explain. Get it done and let them howl.)
To: PatrickHenry
Hahahahaha! But wait! They'll blame GWB. Curses! Foiled again.
57
posted on
09/22/2004 12:18:12 PM PDT
by
Shryke
(Never retreat. Never explain. Get it done and let them howl.)
To: Lunatic Fringe
My view exactly, in my idea of a real attack this is what they would use as it can be delivered with a lot of noticeably instead of a loud noise and a quick reaction this can be dispersed by so many means which would go undetected until people began to fall over. More attention needs to be directed in this direction. Bump
58
posted on
09/22/2004 12:19:09 PM PDT
by
cav68
To: Neocon Shavuz
9. Liberals wonder "why do they hate us?"
59
posted on
09/22/2004 12:20:06 PM PDT
by
Area Freeper
(From John Kerry, they get a "yes/no/maybe" bowl of mush that can only encourage our enemies)
To: Doomonyou
Don't forget all the many who will die in the retaliation
60
posted on
09/22/2004 12:21:40 PM PDT
by
clamper1797
(This Vietnam Vet is NOT Fonda kerry)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-184 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson