Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wildbill
I agree there was probably some semblance of collusion. However, we need to put on our scholarly, unbiased hat on if we are to have an impact on the commission.

However, some of us are mulling over whether of not to mention the net sales angle at http://wizbangblog.com/archives/003652.php as a kind of place marker for the investigative alphabet soups if it gets that far. If you follow those links, it is pretty telling re the "Bath" mention which is in the USA Today Memo versions.

Regards, Dick
21 posted on 09/23/2004 2:04:41 PM PDT by dickmc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: dickmc

net sales angle???

What's this about? Are you going to try and sell the report?


36 posted on 09/23/2004 3:06:05 PM PDT by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: dickmc

The GOP Research division came out with a Chronology that looks pretty good, but they missed the collusion with the Boston Globe and the New York Times.

We have some credibility now since everyone in the country knows FREEPERS started the ball rolling in investigating the Rather forgeries. I wouldn't be surprised if you couldn't get the door opened at CBS by simply calling the news division and saying that we have a written report we want to submit to the investigating panel. Maybe use Buckhead to call or write on his letterhead.

My guess is they'd pee in their pants and be very cooperative and respectful at this point. They can't afford another week of thousands of emails criscrossing the country about how they won't accept our report and testimony.


38 posted on 09/23/2004 3:11:51 PM PDT by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson