In this case, several Freepers are over-determining this. The memos are FABRICATIONS. The signature, call it a forgery, bad cut and paste job, whatever, was affixed to add a touch of reality, yes, but we get to our determination of what these docs are by what the creator(s) intended, which was to make fakes, from the ground up, that would be taken for real. A FORGERY would be a real check, say, with a forged signature; real contracts ... but with forged signatures, etc.
So, whether or not the signature was forged or "cut'n'paste" would be entire separate trial day's discourse?