Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WHY CBS SHOULD FIRE DAN RATHER
aim.org ^ | February 1988 | Reed Irvine, Editor Cliff Kincaid, Associate Editor

Posted on 09/24/2004 9:48:38 AM PDT by crushelits

The CBS News assault on Vice President George Bush led by Dan Rather and aired on the CBS Evening News on January 25 was planned, scripted and rehearsed like a secret military operation. CBS worked on it for over a month according to Rather himself. We don't know if it had a code name, but "Bush whacker" would be fitting, since the purpose of the operation was clearly to deliver a damaging blow to the Bush campaign for the Republican presidential nomination "as close to the actual Iowa) caucus date as possible," to quote from a letter CBS News sent to Bush requesting the interview. CBS employed deception to lure Bush into a trap, surprise to knock him off balance and what The Washington Post in an editorial described as "the journalistic equivalent of a spray of machine-gun fire" to soften up the target. That referred to the six-minute taped report that was aired just before Rather began his live interview of Bush. The report was designed to demonstrate that the vice president was not being truthful and candid in his replies to questions about his involvement in the Iran arms affair.

In introducing this report, Rather said CBS News had spent more than a month preparing it. That meant that they were already well along when on January 5, Richard M. Cohen, senior politics producer for CBS News, sent Bush a letter saying, "Part of our early coverage of the 1988 presidential election has been a series of candidate profiles.... We purposely saved your profile for last, so it could be aired in January, as close to the actual (Iowa) caucus date as possible. Dan Rather is very interested in your profile and has decided to do it him- self.

(Excerpt) Read more at aim.org ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 10years; attacksgoback; ratherbias

1 posted on 09/24/2004 9:48:38 AM PDT by crushelits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: crushelits

I'm pretty sure that "aim.org" does NOT require excerpting. Please don't excerpt unless necessary.

Thank you.


2 posted on 09/24/2004 9:51:42 AM PDT by EggsAckley (......so many vanities....................so little bandwidth.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushelits

Excellent find.


3 posted on 09/24/2004 9:53:59 AM PDT by Rutles4Ever (The message of the Cross is foolishness to those who are perishing...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushelits

See the kind of garbage that happens when you don't have an Internet?;)


4 posted on 09/24/2004 9:54:34 AM PDT by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushelits

Without reading the article, I will take an opposite position. They should keep him on so I have an alternative to Comedy Central.


5 posted on 09/24/2004 9:55:49 AM PDT by xmm0 (This post has been brought to you by the letters "U," "S," and "A" and Amendment number 1.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushelits

Uh, he's the "Vice President"???


6 posted on 09/24/2004 9:57:31 AM PDT by JoJo Gunn (Help control the Leftist population - have them spayed or neutered.©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushelits
Rather should be fired and thrown into jail for disseminating forged documents with the expressed purpose of affecting the outcome of a Federal Election for President of the United States.
7 posted on 09/24/2004 9:58:15 AM PDT by Nyboe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushelits

This is from '88.

Never mind....


8 posted on 09/24/2004 9:58:58 AM PDT by JoJo Gunn (Help control the Leftist population - have them spayed or neutered.©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoJo Gunn

That's the whole point.


9 posted on 09/24/2004 10:00:04 AM PDT by crushelits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley

If the source is one we want to support, we should excerpt so that the original site gets the traffic, shouldn't we?


10 posted on 09/24/2004 10:01:27 AM PDT by pcgTheDestroyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley

According to FR, please excerpt aim.org.


11 posted on 09/24/2004 10:01:35 AM PDT by crushelits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: crushelits

My mistake. Aim.org is on the list.


12 posted on 09/24/2004 10:02:47 AM PDT by EggsAckley (......so many vanities....................so little bandwidth.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: crushelits

They need to fire Heyward for waiting this long to fire Rather.


13 posted on 09/24/2004 10:02:49 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andy Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pcgTheDestroyer

No. Unnecessary excerpting is annoying and can often lure Freepers into not-so-secure sites. If we want to go to a site, it should be OUR choice, not yours.


14 posted on 09/24/2004 10:04:13 AM PDT by EggsAckley (......so many vanities....................so little bandwidth.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: crushelits
Why CBS should fire Dan Rather If they choose not to do so, and instead if CBS should set Dan Rather on Fire, I would also accept that.
15 posted on 09/24/2004 10:06:37 AM PDT by The_Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushelits
....Dan Rather is not only using his powerful position as managing editor of the CBS Evening News to intervene in our political process, but he is doing so by linking arms with the far left, helping them promote their political agenda, louting CBS News standards in the process.

This is a dangerous development for democracy....

...Rather is acting as if he were the head of a fourth branch of government. He is not content with merely his multi-million dollar salary. He wants to exercise power as well, the power to determine what our government's policies will be and even who will be our next president....

16 years later and nothing has really changed over there at CBS. In fact all three of the Networks have been engaged in manipulation of the news for quite some time. The Internet sure is cool.

16 posted on 09/24/2004 10:08:56 AM PDT by Radix (This Tag Line is real, but the contents are fake.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushelits
WHY CBS SHOULD FIRE DAN RATHER

To save CBSNews....I'd just as soon they keep him. Let him, as the captain, go down with the ship.

17 posted on 09/24/2004 10:15:07 AM PDT by Onelifetogive (* Sarcasm tag ALWAYS required. For some FReepers, sarcasm can NEVER be obvious enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoJo Gunn

Actually - this old article reveals the pattern to the CBS bias. It just gives firther reason that Rather should be canned.

Unfortunately, even if he were fired, CBS would just replace him with another leftist.


18 posted on 09/24/2004 10:54:45 AM PDT by TheBattman (Islam - the cult of Satan - The DemocRAT Party= Acolytes of SATAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: crushelits

19 posted on 09/24/2004 12:18:47 PM PDT by Caleb1411
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson