Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Indian Country: America's military faces the most thankless task in the history of warfare.
The Wall Street Journal Opinion Journal ^ | September 25, 2004 | Robert D. Kaplan

Posted on 09/24/2004 9:25:15 PM PDT by quidnunc

An overlooked truth about the war on terrorism, and the war in Iraq in particular, is that they both arrived too soon for the American military: before it had adequately transformed itself from a dinosaurian, Industrial Age beast to a light and lethal instrument skilled in guerrilla warfare, attuned to the local environment in the way of the 19th-century Apaches.

My mention of the Apaches is deliberate. For in a world where mass infantry invasions are becoming politically and diplomatically prohibitive — even as dirty little struggles proliferate, featuring small clusters of combatants hiding out in Third World slums, deserts and jungles — the American military is back to the days of fighting the Indians.

The red Indian metaphor is one with which a liberal policy nomenklatura may be uncomfortable, but Army and Marine field officers have embraced it because it captures perfectly the combat challenge of the early 21st century. But they don't mean it as a slight against the Native North Americans. The fact that radio call signs so often employ Indian names is an indication of the troops' reverence for them.

The range of Indian groups, numbering in their hundreds, that the U.S. Cavalry and Dragoons had to confront was no less varied than that of the warring ethnic and religious militias spread throughout Eurasia, Africa and South America in the early 21st century. When the Cavalry invested Indian encampments, they periodically encountered warrior braves beside women and children, much like Fallujah. Though most Cavalry officers tried to spare the lives of noncombatants, inevitable civilian casualties raised howls of protest among humanitarians back East, who, because of the dissolution of the conscript army at the end of the Civil War, no longer empathized with a volunteer force beyond the Mississippi that was drawn from the working classes.…

(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: americanindians; domesticterrorism; indianwars; iraq; jihadinamerica; ushistory

1 posted on 09/24/2004 9:25:16 PM PDT by quidnunc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: quidnunc
because of the dissolution of the conscript army at the end of the Civil War, no longer empathized with a volunteer force beyond the Mississippi that was drawn from the working classes.…

Didn't get any farther. The vast majority of Union soldiers during the WBTS were volunteers, if sometimes bonused or shamed into volunteering.

3 posted on 09/24/2004 9:28:49 PM PDT by Restorer (They have the microphone, but we have the remote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc; Howlin

Thanks for the post. That's a great model of the Iraqi situation. Strong writing, great points.


4 posted on 09/24/2004 9:30:16 PM PDT by Petronski (What did Terri McAuliffe know and when did she know it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen
the Army never learned the lesson that small units of foot soldiers were more effective against the Indians than large mounted regiments burdened by the need to carry forage for horses

What's this guy smoking?

Small units of foot soldiers versus mounted guerrilla fighters who lived off the land. Sounds like a winning tactic!

5 posted on 09/24/2004 9:33:23 PM PDT by Restorer (They have the microphone, but we have the remote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Restorer

A patient bow and arrow on a ridge will stop 5 impatient cavalry.


6 posted on 09/24/2004 9:37:22 PM PDT by johnd01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen
Hmm, Autonomy helps get stuff done, but it also opens the doors to corruption. I believe that 95% of the officers in the army will act honorably, but that other 5% can make a whole lotta problems.

Oh, and it might be a good idea to keep some of our 'dinosaurian industrial era' army. Russia? China? European Union? They couldn't take us down, not right now anyway, but we all know how fast things like that can change.

7 posted on 09/24/2004 9:41:28 PM PDT by sociotard (I am the one true Sociotard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
L8R



8 posted on 09/24/2004 9:49:51 PM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
"Thanks for the post. That's a great model of the Iraqi situation. Strong writing, great points."

Except for one thing. His analogy is way off base. The Apache's use of small unit tactics worked in the short run but not in the long run. You need to back that up with overwhelming force and the resolve to use it.

9 posted on 09/24/2004 10:01:47 PM PDT by blackbart.223
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen

I think he's stretching a point on almost every point he makes - and he misses the one point that's the most significant: this war with medieval Islam is "settlers vs. Injuns", redux. You've got a civilized, literate, technological society at war with a bunch of maniacal, savage thugs. (Yes, that's what the American Indians were, regardless of how much the leftist textbooks rhapsodize over and idealize them. There's a reason why Benjamin Franklin said they all ought to be exterminated.)

As a friend of mine rather succinctly put it, "We're fighting a bunch of cavemen" (particularly apropos in Afghanistan, I'd say). It's no accident that these savages want to take us back to the 12th Century - that's where they feel the most comfortable.

Bush put it exactly right when he said they have declared war on the civilized world. He's got no illusions about it. But I suppose, in another 100 years, leftist textbooks will be full of vapid prattle about how much valuable culture we lost when we wiped out the Islamikazis - if we haven't succeeded in ridding the world of leftists as well, by then.

Meanwhile, "Manifest Destiny" is an idea whose time has come again...


10 posted on 09/24/2004 10:45:32 PM PDT by fire_eye (Socialism is the opiate of academia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fire_eye

Absolutely!


11 posted on 09/25/2004 12:00:53 AM PDT by Brian Allen (I am, thank God, a hyphenated American: An AMERICAN-American - AND a Dollar-a-Day FReeper-2XBlessed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
And as the thunderous roar of a global cosmopolitan press corps gets louder--demanding the application of abstract principles of universal justice that, sadly, are often neither practical nor necessarily synonymous with American national interest

at least this theme was one that 99.9% of Freepers would agree with ( i think)

12 posted on 11/26/2006 9:39:19 PM PST by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson