This kid should be able to have his picture. When I first heard of this, I thought perhaps he might have been trying to emulate a gangbanger with his stocking cap and arms folded across his chest holding a 9mm pistol.
This is the kids legal hobby and passion. This is just anti-gun liberals in action. Skeet shooting has nothing to do with school violence. Since you are five times more likely to be beaten to death with a pair of bare hands than to be killed with an assault weapon, should hands be outlawed from appearing in pictures? Just because a kid can hang him or herself with a belt, should belts be banned from pictures?
On a lighter note: I live in Massachusetts, and went up to NH to watch an airshow Sunday. A Massachusetts Air National Guard A-10 Thunderbolt was there, and after the pilot came out of the cockpit and took his harness off, I thought I saw a holstered sidearm. When I wondered aloud if it was, and if they were allowed to fly with them outside a war zone, my buddy interjected: "If he has to ditch in Cambridge, he is going to need his weapon!" (For those not in the know, Cambridge may be the most liberal part of the most liberal state in the union. We call it "The Peoples Republic of Cambridge...:)
It's more liberal/socialist than Berkeley, California?