Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jbwbubba

Pat Cadell said that the late undecideds usually break for the incumbent, that this challenger's late-surge from undecideds theory is just a myth.


2 posted on 09/28/2004 9:53:16 AM PDT by BonnieJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BonnieJ

"Howard Dean had a policy difference with the Bush administration on Iraq; Kerry essentially does not."

Which Kerry policy on Iraq is the author talking about?


4 posted on 09/28/2004 9:59:01 AM PDT by Uncle Vlad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BonnieJ

I think we see a lot of undecideds breaking for whoever is winning. Because by now, if you are still undecided, you are not that smart and do not have very deep values.


5 posted on 09/28/2004 9:59:29 AM PDT by epluribus_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BonnieJ; wideawake
Third, this is indeed a tight race and--as with any incumbent seeking reelection--the undecided vote will break heavily against Bush, which will make Kerry look like he is surging late. (Even hapless Michael Dukakis had such a late surge.)

Late surge from Dukakis? PUH-LEEZE. Dukakis lost California for crying out loud.

II think this article is cliched. Most of those assumptions were true on 9-10, but its a 9-11 world now. I believe Murphy is the guy who ran McCain's "Straight Talk Express" campaign as well as some others.

11 posted on 09/28/2004 10:27:56 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator (I am poster #48)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson