Posted on 09/28/2004 11:58:32 AM PDT by CHARLITE
I remember this too....not exactly the Life magazine but the Middle East connection etc....
OK. That's Kerry with Osama, Saddam, Khadafi, Arafat and ...?Bernhard Langer?
Looks like Bernhard Langer to me.
"Bernhard Langer?"
Hell, lets ask Skerry, he would know :)
And the Clintons -- both of them -- are superstars in their ability at manipulating people. The way I consider it, the Clintons spent an entire eight years (nine, counting the run-up to the '92 election) establishing and maintaining a dysfunctional, codependent relationship with a good number of America's voters. The whole Clinton charade was an exercise in psychological sickness on a very massive scale -- probably the most massive scale since Hitler's rise in Germany.
"Kerry wants the presidency for the sake of having the presidency, successfully converting his pathology and dysfunctional self into a public spectacle, whence he will set about wrecking the military establishment he despises and undermining the credibility abroad of the country he secretly loathes."
Kerry got his way with his peacenik chicken sh*t gang in the 70's and it brought us betrayal in Vietnam. He is again trying to apply his same treason format for Iraq. WAKE UP FOLKS!
"...It seems that Senator Clinton is a bit bitter. Bitter people can’t and won’t promote their own ideas. They won’t take responsibility, even to the extent that Senator Lott did a few years ago, for advocating their actual ideas (ideas which are right or wrong, foolish or wise).
One of the reasons people like Hillary Clinton come across as so bitter is that they have nothing to offer, and they’re smart enough to know it. For a woman like Hillary Clinton, whom I suspect craves power like you or I could never begin to imagine, it’s particularly frustrating. Her life has been one huge compromise – against feminism (by defending her sexually predatory husband); against welfare statism (by allowing her husband to sign off on welfare reform and capital gains tax cuts); and even against her youthful inclinations as a limited government/Barry Goldwater/Ayn Rand fan.
All this compromise has been in the pursuit of one thing only: power. She wants power from the people and over the people, but there’s only one problem: the people keep demanding ideas. She’s afraid to articulate her real ideas, of course, because if she did she would end up like she did after her infamous 1994 health care debacle. So Hillary, like her supporters throughout the country, are left with a single emotion and a single policy: bitterness.
What happens if someone like this ever gains real power"?
The above is an excerpt from part of a wonderfully scathing article from Michael Hurd in Capitalism Magazine, December 31, 2002 titled "Hillary Clinton's Intellectual Bankruptcy"
I think you'll appreciate this excerpt.
She has no firm principles on which she operates.
here is the problem: It doesnt matter.
the entire DEM party now is LEFTIST not Liberal. They are actually an anti-American party that wants to destroy American soverignty. At some point a DEM will win. It doesnt matter if it is Kerry, Clinton or some yet unkown DEM politician. The results will all be the same.
"I suspect that Edwards knows that Kerry was involved in the Rathergate conspiracy" He does.
, and he doesn't want to have anything to do with him.
I would not go that far.
They probably have faced the music and have realized that they will lose at the ballot box. They are now focusing on winning in the courts.
Edwards is plenty busy.
They already have the democrat party.
Current indications point to a McGovern-level blowout in November, in the absence of MASSIVE vote fraud by the Dems. Look for massive vote fraud
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.