I've been doing research to add to my chart: Connect the Dots . . . Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden at the following web site:
http://www.archive-news.net/Articles/SH040923.html.
I'm primarily looking for what the media was saying before September 11, 2001. And how their story has changed since.
It was interesting to hear this report.
There probably wasn't a terrorist that Saddam didn't like and supported most of them one way or another.
Just my attempt to make the case for why we went to war against Saddam, and why the war in Iraq IS part of the war on terror. (Yes, I know WE all know that.)
.
I wish Bush would say this to Kerry during the debate -
Saddam had WMD - he used them on his own people - the whole world knew he had them. What did he do with them? He never proved that he got rid of them.
If you had the responsibility of protecting the lives of 280 million people, and all of the intelligence said he had them - and he never showed any proof of getting rid of them - would anyone in their right mind not take him seriously?
Would anyone possibly think that he wouldn't conspire or hand them off to terrorists? One would have to be foolish to think he would not. A leader would be extremely irresponsible not to take action - would you rather fight the likes of Zarqawi over there or here?
Somebody get the President on the line....
Thanks for all your efforts!