Posted on 09/28/2004 3:59:40 PM PDT by hags
Edited on 09/28/2004 4:05:58 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
Has anybody see this?
Unlike McCain, Bush, and Gore,,,, Kerry has adamantly refused to authorize >the release of his military records. Most think it's because of his phony >battle medals. I think the real reason is below. He was not granted an >Honorable Discharge until March 2001, almost 30 years after his ostensible >service term had ended!
************
Mr. Jennings, investigate this:
From A. L. "Steve" Nash, MAC Ret, UDT/SEAL SEAL
> Authentication Team -Director AuthentiSEAL
www.authentiseal.org
"Unlike McCain, Bush, and Gore, Kerry has adamantly refused to authorize the release of his military records. Most think it's because of his phony battle medals. I think the real reason is below.
He was not granted an Honorable Discharge until March 2001, almost 30 years after his ostensible service term had ended!
This is very much out of the ordinary, and highly suspect. There are 5 classes of Discharge: Honorable, General, Other Than Honorable, Bad Conduct, and Dishonorable. My guess is that he was Discharged in the '70s, but not Honorably. He appealed this sometime while Clinton was president. Political pressure was applied, and the Honorable Discharge was then granted.. His file is probably rife with reports of this, submissions and hearings on the appeal, reports of his "giving aid and comfort" to the enemy, along with protests that were filed with respect to his alleged valor under fire.
Lt. Kerry met with NVA and Vietcong communist leaders in Paris, in direct violation of the UCMJ and the U.S. Constitution.
Lt. Kerry by his own words & actions violated the UCMJ and the U.S. Code while serving as a Navy officer.
Lt. Kerry stands in violation of Article 3, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution.
Lt. Kerry's 1970 meeting with NVA Communists in Paris is in direct violation of the UCMJ's Article 104 part 904, and U.S. Code 18 U.S.C. 953. That meeting, and Kerry's subsequent support of the communists while leading mass protests against our military in the year that followed, also place him in direct violation of our Constitution's Article 3, Section 3, which defines treason as "giving aid and comfort" to the enemy in time of warfare.
The Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment, Section 3,states, "No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President
and Vice-President ... having previously taken an oath to support the Constitution of the United States, [who has] engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.""
INVESTIGATE THIS MR JENNINGS, RATHER AND BROKAW!
Unlike McCain, Bush, and Gore,,,, Kerry has adamantly refused to authorize >the release of his military records. Most think it's because of his phony >battle medals. I think the real reason is below. He was not granted an >Honorable Discharge until March 2001, almost 30 years after his ostensible >service term had ended! > >This is very much out of the ordinary, and highly suspect. There are 5 >classes of Discharge: Honorable, General, Other Than Honorable, Bad >Conduct, and Dishonorable. My guess is that he was Discharged in the '70s, >but not Honorably. He appealed this sometime while Clinton was doing >trouser-tricks ! in the Oval Office. Political pressure was applied, and >the Honorable Discharge was then granted. > >His file is probably rife with reports of this, submissions and hearings >on the appeal, reports of his "giving aid and comfort" to the enemy, along >with protests that were filed with respect to his alleged valor under >fire. This will blow up in his face before October 15th. > >On 18 Feb. 1966 John Kerry signed a 6 year enlistment contract with the >Navy (plus a 6-month extension during wartime). > >On 18 Feb. 1966 John Kerry also signed an Officer Candidate contract for 6 >years -- 5 years of ACTIVE duty & ACTIVE Naval Reserves, and 1 year of >inactive standby reserves (See items #4 & #5). > >Because John Kerry was discharged from TOTAL ACTIVE DUTY of only 3 years >and 18 days on 3 Jan. 1970, he was then required to attend 48 drills per >year, and not more than 17 days active duty for training. > >Kerr! y was also subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice. >Additionally, Kerry, as a commissioned officer, was prohibited from making >adverse statements against his chain of command or statements against his >country, especially during time of war. It is also interesting to note >that Kerry did not obtain an honorable discharge until Mar. 12, 2001 even >though his service obligation should have ended July 1, 1972. > >Lt. John Kerry's letter of 21 Nov. 1969 asking for an early release from >active US Navy duty falsely states "My current regular period of obligated >service would be completed in December of this year." > >On Jan. 3, 1970 Lt. John Kerry was transferred to the Naval Reserve >Manpower Center in Bainridge, Maryland. Where are Kerry's Performance >Records for 2 years of obligated Ready Reserve, the 48 drills per year >required and his 17 days of active duty per year training while ! Kerry >was in the Ready Reserves? Have these records been released? > >Has anyone ever talked to Kerry's Commanding Officer at the Naval Reserve >Center where Kerry drilled? > >On 1 July 1972 Lt. John Kerry was transferred to Standby Reserve Inactive. > >On 16 February 1978 Lt. John Kerry was discharged from US Naval Reserve. > >Below are some of the crimes Lt. Kerry USNR committed as a Ready >Reservist, while he was acting as a leader of Vietnam Veterans Against the >War: > >1. Lt. Kerry attended many rallies where the Vietcong flag was displayed >while our flag was desecrated, defiled, and mocked, thereby giving aid and >comfort to the enemy. > >2. Lt. Kerry was involved in a meeting that voted on assassinating members >of the US Senate. > >3. Lt. Kerry lied under oath against fellow soldiers before the US Senate >about crimes committed in Vietnam. > >4. Lt. Kerry professed to being a war criminal on national television, and >condemned the military and the USA. > >5. Lt. Kerry met with NVA and Vietcong communist leaders in Paris, in >direct violation of the UCMJ and the U.S. Constitution. > >6. Lt. Kerry by his own words & actions violated the UCMJ and the U.S. >Code while serving as a Navy officer. Lt. Kerry stands in violation of >Article 3, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution. > >7. Lt. Kerry's 1970 meeting with NVA Communists in Paris is in direct >violation of the UCMJ's Article 104 part 904, and U.S. Code 18 U.S.C. 953. >That meeting, and Kerry's subsequent support of the communists while >leading m! ass protests against our military in the year that followed, >also place him in direct violation of our Constitution's Article 3, >Section 3, which defines treason as "giving aid and comfort" to the enemy >in time of warfare. > >The Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment, Section 3, states, "No person
>shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President >and Vice-President ... having previously taken an oath to support the >Constitution of the United States, [who has] engaged in insurrection or >rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof." > >A. L. "Steve" Nash, MAC Ret, UDT/SEAL SEAL Authentication Team Director >AuthentiSEAL Phone 707 438 0120 "The only service where all investigators >are US Navy SEALs" www.authentiseal.org
hags
Since Sep 28, 2004
Where's Rather's report on this? Hmmmmm
My tagline says it all.
talk about needing proper editing
BUMP for later formatting
I have been asking these same question here and in chat for months and not gotten an answer. My other question is where did Kerry's crew go when John O'Neil took over his boat. Oneil makes no mention of Kerrys crew working for him , nor do any of Kerrys crew say they worked for O'Neil. where did they dissappear to?
So that we can read it right, could you possibly edit it to include line and paragraph breaks? Much appreciated.
I hadnt seen or read all this... but it doesnt surprise me.. To think CBS spent 5 years so they say, on that fake piece of trash on our President, and Kerry hasnt even released all his records....it just shows the MSM bias for what it is.....SOB's
You must have been dishonorably discharged from HTML Bootcamp.
Where's his DD Form 214? On that form it lists your discharge if it was Honorable, General, or Bad Conduct. This form is given to you when you are separating from the service. Or did Uncle Teddy take care of that too?
Needs a link. Thanks.
Very good perspective. Having a dishonorable discharge sure would explain a lot--why Botox Ketchupman won't sign the SF-180, why the Navy won't release anything, why guttersnipes like Dan Blather and Terry "the Crook" McAuliffe stays on the offensive re the Prez records. Wow! Hopes it true. Then We the People should have a nationwide protest.
October Surprise! ...let's hope!
Many don't officially resign their commission.
I don't know, I didn't post the article. Ask "hags" - he's #1.
can anyone provide proof that bush signed a form 180?
I keep getting called a liar for asserting this at work.
I cannot find any proof of this on the net,
peopel keep saying Bush signed a form 180, but they never have any proof, it is always " i read it soemwhere/someone told me"
the only reference I get to it is a washington times article august 18, 2004 in which mcclellan states the following:
" At the White House, press secretary Scott McClellan said he couldn't say specifically whether Mr. Bush signed Standard Form 180, but the president did request and release his own military records in February.
"I don't believe he signed any form, but he did authorize making his military records available publicly," Mr. McClellan said. "We have released all the records, and reporters were allowed to look at his medical records as well."
Kerry's dd-214 is posted on his website, some peopel say kerry's dd-214 is forged,
I cannot find a copy of Bush's dd-214 or any document with his separation codes anywhere.
Some say the guard doesn't use dd-214s.
can anyone clear that up?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.