Throwing in my 2 cents.
Here is what I heard:
* Kerry denegrates the coalition in Iraq and Iraq itself
* Kerry wants to build a better coaltion for the wrong war at the wrong time
* Kerry will do it faster and better, just because
* Kerry thinks the U.S. should have been more confrontational in dealing with Iran at the same time he thinks we are too confrontation in dealing with Iraq
* Kerry thinks Iran would listen to us
* Kerry wants to give up our nuclear programs for the cause of nuclear non-proliferation
* Kerry is AGAINST the coalition dealing with North Korea
* Kerry wants to go it alone and take on North Korea because ... he can do it faster and better, just because
I could care less about style -- I could not keep track of the number of flip-flops and inconsistencies just within the debate itself. And everyone saying "Kerry had facts" is just silly, he may have made statements that sounded like facts but it was so absurd one doesn't know where to start.
He denegrates the coalition in Iraq and at the same time wants to go it alone against North Korea! And people buy this???!
"I could care less about style -- I could not keep track of the number of flip-flops and inconsistencies just within the debate itself. And everyone saying "Kerry had facts" is just silly, he may have made statements that sounded like facts but it was so absurd one doesn't know where to start."
That is my take also. Good post!
lol...I noticed that too. Kerry has a "four point plan," more troops on the border, faster training of Iraqi troops, etc., la la la. Just HOW he is going to do this is quite unknown. And all this....for a war he would not have went into. What a leader, style, broad promises, mixed messages, no substance.
lol...I noticed that too. Kerry has a "four point plan," more troops on the border, faster training of Iraqi troops, etc., la la la. Just HOW he is going to do this is quite unknown. And all this....for a war he would not have went into. What a leader, style, broad promises, mixed messages, no substance.