Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wouldntbprudent

I believe I heard this on Fox News last week, but I can't remember if it was something that Kerry said recently, or if he actually said it after the end of the first Gulf War. Instead of sending U.S. troops into Iraq to take out Saddam in '91, Kerry believed the job could be done by outsiders (meaning individuals in other countries) and Iraqis who were against Saddam. If I recall correctly, he basically said that he wanted to arm those individuals and have them do the job. But in the case of Tora Bora, he complained that the U.S. "outsourced" the operation by using war lords. In my estimation, this is yet another example of how he contradicts himself over and over.


12 posted on 10/01/2004 9:41:27 AM PDT by mass55th (Kerry: Classless and clueless!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: mass55th

Didn't Kerry also say he would send troops to eliminate Bin Ladin? I thought we ruled out assassination as a military tactic.


23 posted on 10/01/2004 9:59:44 AM PDT by Old Professer (The Truth always gets lost in the Noise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: mass55th

This does not have to be excerpted, so I'll post it all here:




KERRY MAY HAVE GIVEN HIS FOES TOO MUCH FODDER [10/01 12:15 PM]

Irony watch: I admit I've been flip-flopping this morning.

On the one hand, last night Kerry was the best he was since the Democratic convention, and maybe the primaries. My head is saying, that's got to give him at least a point or two in the polls, if not more. He no longer looks orange, he no longer is giving dull, droning, rambling answers. If he didn't quite look presidential, he stopped looking like the tall Dukakis.

On the other hand, my gut is saying that Kerry didn't do what he needed to do. Kerry Spot reader John points out that the Democratic candidate gave his foes a lot of ammunition for the coming days:

Kerry obviously won on style. He looked good. But who has the material to work with and exploit over the next week? Clearly Bush.

1. "Global test?" Major mistake. We're gonna hear a lot about this. Probably today. Hopefully today.

2. Kerry didn't seem to know there were already sanctions on Iran.

3. Summit. Summit. Summit. Blah, Blah. Blah.

4. Kerry is opposed to the nuclear bunker busters as though we're the moral equivelant of our enemies. How very 80's of him.

5. Kerry certainly won Kim Jong Il's vote.

6. Kerry wants both bi-lateral AND multi-lateral discussions with North Korea? Sheesh. How about a stand? Sorry, forgot who we're dealing with.

7. Kerry said nuclear proliferation is his greatest fear and opposes missile defense? Uhm, okay.

8. He mis-spoke about the 87 billion dollars? How about, as Bush might put it, he mis-voted? Terrible reponse.

9. Was Iraq a mistake, or wasn't it? He doesn't know. He says both in the same debate. I rub my hands in anticipation of the RNC's commercial on this.

10. No subways were closed during the Republican convention. Duh.

There's little I see for Kerry to work with coming out of this debate in a substantive way. Bush can make hay. Kerry can pump his fist in the air. I'd prefer both but given the choice, I'll take the hay.


Maybe I can Kerry my way out of these conflicting senses. Kerry's style was dramatically improved, but the substance of his answers is going to hurt him in the coming days... and I return to my prediction of last night, no dramatic movement in the polls in either direction.


24 posted on 10/01/2004 9:59:51 AM PDT by Howlin (What's the Font Spacing, Kenneth?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson