Mark, I dislike having to say this, but sometimes, you are a "third-rate hack."
Where you wrote, "with John Kerry, he wasn't wrong on the substance, he just didn't have enough of it."
Mark, read the Debate Record again, if you bothered reading it at all. Kerry had no substance. He uttered statements that are known in common knowledge as lies. He was full of logical fallacies.
Read what our President said very specifically about summits. Summits are happening without Kerry's interference.
Kerry lost the debate, big time. The only positive response he received was the applause of all the, uh, dilations excited by emotions in reaction to the comparison between his voice and our President's voice. But many of our best and strongest men have voices that would not be used for drama heroes.
But when it matters the most, our USA is not a nation of hysteria. Logical reviews of the Debate are on the way. Sorting logic from effeminate manipulation requires more time and "work," and President Bush will win the Election by a landslide.
Read the Record, Mark, and write another one.
Mark and Hugh Hewitt should have an interesting debate Monday. Steyn thinks Bush flopped. Hewitt thinks Bush creamed Kerry on substance, time and time again.