Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report From Crawford, Texas
Stephen Cook | October 2, 2004 | Stephen Cook

Posted on 10/02/2004 9:07:43 PM PDT by Richard Kimball

As many of you know, I have been a sports photographer for the Texas Iconoclast for the last three years. This week, the Iconoclast endorsed John Kerry over President Bush. Of course, Bush's home town newspaper endorsing his challenger made national news. While it came as no surprise to local residents, it was a chance for the national media to tout that even in Crawford, Texas, the citizens were turning against George Bush. The reality of the situation is a little bit different. As someone who has worked for the paper for a while, I know a little bit more about the story than most. While I will not reveal inside information (I believe it's unethical), here's the real scoop on what has happened.

Most of the editorial board on the Iconoclast is liberal. Leon Smith started the paper after George Bush was elected in 2000. He also runs the Clifton paper, and started up a paper in Valley Mills, which quickly folded. Don Fisher asked me to take sports photographs beginning in 2002. The Iconoclast is run completely out of Clifton. It has no offices in Crawford, nor do any of the principal figures operating the paper live in Crawford.

Crawford, Texas is a small town, with approximately 900 residents. It's located approximately 15 miles west of Waco, Texas. Prior to George Bush moving there, it was just another Texas town. Regionally, it has always been known for having an excellent school system and being extremely competitive in all sports. It's an unusual year when the Crawford Pirates, the local high school football team, don't go to the playoffs.

The citizens of Crawford are generally culturally conservative. They like George Bush, whether they are Republican or Democrat, and consider him a good neighbor. Practically every business in town either has a "George Bush 2004" banner or a "Four More Years" sign. Part of this is business, of course. Crawford has experienced a boom from having the President as a resident. There's something beyond that, though. If George Bush is faking being a "good ole' boy", he's a better actor than Dustin Hoffman ever was. Most of the local citizenry who have met him like him as a neighbor and a person.

When the paper first started, the citizens were thrilled. Previously, the McGregor Mirror, from seven miles south, provided the only newspaper coverage for Crawford. Generally, that meant one black and white photo whenever the McGregor Bulldogs had an off week. After the Iconoclast came to town, there was weekly coverage, with at least eight or ten photos, over half in color, and some on the front page.

After a while, though, it became apparent that something else was going on. Shortly after the Democrats began their drive to unseat George Bush, a group came to town and bought an old house. They called it the Crawford Peace House. The house serves as a meeting place for people who want to have demonstrations and parades against the President. None of the people associated with the Peace House are residents of Crawford, and all they really bring to the area are headaches. From my perspective, they're the same bunch of sixties radicals who now use bandanas to cover up bald spots and haven't done anything since 1967 except look for things to protest and a camera to photograph them doing it. The Iconoclast started giving gushing coverage to the Peace House. There were almost weekly stories. The founder was called "a visionary." Most people I talk to hate the Peace House. But to read the Iconoclast, you'd think the Peace House was the only going concern in town. Other events started to crowd the pages of the Iconoclast. When a group of Nader supporters came to town, the paper gave it more coverage than they had the previous year's football playoff games. One photo showed a man with long hair and a beard holding up a Viet Nam Veterans Against the War sign. Another showed a float of a grinning George Bush holding a missile. Most of the citizens ignored the stories, because the paper still covered the local things of interest, including the football, volleyball, and basketball games of the beloved Pirates.

With the endorsement of John Kerry, though, the citizens of Crawford felt betrayed. While everyone might not be voting for George Bush, they didn't like the tactics used by Leon and the paper. If, they felt, he wanted to endorse John Kerry, why not do it in the Clifton paper? There was a collective sense of being used as an elaborate prop. If an actively Democratic newspaper publisher in Clifton, Texas had endorsed John Kerry, it wouldn't have even been news in Waco. By using the Crawford paper to make the endorsement, though, he had used them as a prop, implying defections from President Bush that don't exist. It wasn't so much the endorsement that bothered them, as the sense that he had used them to climb aboard a national stage to stab one of their neighbors in the back.

From a local standpoint, the paper is now in trouble. The reporter that used to cover most of the local stories didn't go to the homecoming game Friday night. I heard rumors that he had been threatened, but also that many citizens had just made it plain they didn't want him there. A local college student covered the story. There were a spate of cancelled advertisements and subscriptions. It was suggested to me that I could pick up the paper for a song, and that the local subscriptions and adverstising would return, but that doesn't really make any financial sense. There are rumors that other organizations are considering starting a paper there, and for the first time in a couple of years, I saw the owner of the McGregor paper at the homecoming game, taking some photographs. I've been approached about moving my sports photos to another paper. From a national standpoint, the endorsement was a commercial success. There were hundreds of new subscriptions, although none from Crawford, and most of the thousands of letters were supportive, although again, few of those letters were from Crawford.

My friends at the paper seemed genuinely shocked and hurt at the reaction. They reasoned, and accurately, that they came into Crawford, started a newspaper, and had been darned good local citizens. They covered the local sports teams religiously, and covered every local event. The joke around small Texas newspaper offices is that you're not really a reporter or photographer until you've tried to make a chili cookoff interesting. Crawford's paper has a color front and back page, and the reproduction is as good as a daily. Very few weekly newspapers send both a writer and a photographer to cover every football game for the local sports team. It genuinely hurt the staff that one story turned the town so strongly against them.

Friday night, I went and took my photos, as usual, and said hi to all my friends there. I did what I always do. I covered the Pirates, took the best photos I'm capable of taking, posted them to my web site, emailed the notes and names to the paper, and sent an announcement that the pages were posted to all my friends in Crawford.

Here's my perspective. When Don Fisher asked me to take sports photos for the Crawford Pirates three years ago, I didn't know I was starting a love affair. There's something special about Crawford, though, irrespective of whether the President lives there or not. When I was a kid, I hated high school. I didn't go to the football games, the prom, or homecoming. I didn't join any clubs. The only thing I wanted from Richfield High School was out. When I walk into Pirates stadium each week, now, it's like I've finally, at fifty years of age, found my high school. There's a reverent silence during the school song. People stand at attention during the national anthem, and actually get misty. Every little girl from age 18 months up, it seems like, has a Crawford cheerleader uniform. I see my old students from the fire academy, and at least ten people every game shout "hi" from outside the chain link fence that surrounds the field. When I walk around during game breaks to get fan shots, the children crowd down to the front and wave to get my attention. The cheerleaders and players are all friendly, and some of the best looking kids I've ever seen in my life. Sometimes I don't think it's possible to take an ugly photo of a Crawford student. Every game's a family reunion. I've never had a cross word with anyone at Pirate Field.

I've deliberately stayed away from politics in my role as both an employee of a small town paper, and as a sports photographer. Small towns, not just in Texas, but across the country, are unique treasures. They're also increasingly under pressure. Economic forces make being a small farmer or rancher difficult. Most of the decent jobs are in big cities. More and more towns are losing their identities, as they become bedroom communities of larger cities. People often sleep there, but they don't live there. Both the football team and the newspaper are often the unifying factors that help these towns keep their identities. During the week, we may be Baptists, Methodists, Catholics, or agnostics. We may be farmers, lawyers, policemen, teachers or students. We're Democrats, Republicans, Constitutionalists, Anarchists and Idon'tcareists. On Friday night, though, when the lights go on at Pirate Field, we're all Pirates.

Small town papers should serve as a unifying force in the town. People don't buy the local weekly paper to get national news. They buy it to see stories about their town. They want to see which local kid graduated from college. They want to see who's getting married, and who's passed away. They want to see photos of their football team and their annual events. In this respect, I do think the paper has let the town down. If they didn't know this endorsement would create hard feelings, they should have. They also chose to do it here first, and wait a week to put it in the Clifton paper, letting Crawford be the eye of the storm. The national publicity may let Leon create a national paper, which is a local paper in name only. If he wants any long term success, though, he'd better be praying for a Bush victory. He owes this publicity to the man he's trying to unseat. It's a pretty safe bet that none of the new subscribers in Los Angeles or Washington D. C. give a darned about what a small-town newspaperman in Clifton, Texas thinks about national politics, unless the Western White House is twenty miles down the road.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: bushcountry; crawford; endorsements; kerry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last
To: N. Beaujon
That isnt true. The larger picture tells me that this is a referendum on the War Powers Act and the people of this country don't even know it. Vietnam and Iraq are "debacles" because Congress abdicated it's responsibility so when the going gets tough it falls on the executive. Further, it falls on the executive branch to determine national priorities. It's the ultimate weaseling out for Congress and the ultimate loss for our nation.

sorry, I hit post prematurely.

Congress is full of weak as water pussies. I agree that legally and legislatively you may be right, but this affects the soul of the country. Vietnam and Watergate hang over this country like two swords of Damacles.

When the soul shifts, we may get people in that will change the root problems, but as is the soul is conflicted. General propaganda blames conservatives for Vietnam, and God knows conservatives pulled Watergate.

My point is that this election and the war against terror and islamofachism is in front of a new generation. (I include people who could not think for themselves in the 60's in this new generation) The fight is over whether the antiwar movement during Vietnam was patriotic or treasonous.

With the advent of technologies allowing bypassing of the propagandists (MSM) the brainwashing of the Vietnam era can not happen again, and the misguided of the 60's are reforming their world views. Fox, if you add up cable and broadcast had about 13 or 14 million viewers for the first debate. Why? There is a serious shift in the populace towards coming to their own conclusions from reasonably unbiased sources, and preferring a conservative commentary. Was it 9/11? Well, to me, it looks like it started even before that.
61 posted on 10/02/2004 10:24:22 PM PDT by LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball; steplock
Hook 'em Horns!

link


62 posted on 10/02/2004 10:25:29 PM PDT by texasbluebell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball

Ah, I see it's something else.

Could have fooled me...


63 posted on 10/02/2004 10:27:47 PM PDT by texasbluebell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: NYCVirago; No Longer Free State
I plan to keep doing photographs for the paper, and I don't think they'll fire me. If they do, financially it's no big deal. I could make more money buying doorknobs for $2 and selling them for $1.

Without bragging, my photos are a pretty popular part of the paper. Besides, I've already promised the band, flag girls, cheerleaders, players and school administrators that they could use my photos for the yearbook and the banquets, so I'll be photographing every week.

As to me quitting over the flap, I don't think it would be ethical. I committed to photographing every week for the season, and there's just something seamy about quitting at this time. It's kind of a commitment to the kids. I want them to have good photos to look back on when the year is over.

64 posted on 10/02/2004 10:31:30 PM PDT by Richard Kimball (Kerry Campaign: An army of pompous phrases moving across the landscape in search of an idea)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball

This article from the Opinion Journal should explain what is going on with the Iconoclast:

The Iconoclast's Icon
A Baptist-bashing Crawford, Texas, newspaper endorses Kerry.

BY DAVE SHIFLETT
Friday, October 1, 2004 12:01 a.m. EDT

Traditionalist Christians have had a trying week. After a poll by the Gallup Organization put President Bush eight points ahead of Sen. Kerry, Moveon.Org took out an ad noting the evangelical religious credentials of a Gallup family member. Would such a thing happen to Jewish, Islamic or Episcopalian pollsters?

Then came the new issue of Entertainment Weekly, in which Joan Rivers is quoted as saying, "I hate Jesus freaks. They're ugly," adding: " 'Jesus loves me,' they say. If he loved you so much he would have given you a f---ing chin."

And on Tuesday, a Texas weekly called the Lone Star Iconoclast, which is the First Methodist's hometown rag, endorsed John Kerry for president. The endorsement brought the left-leaning paper immediate fame, including a warm write-up in the New York Times. Interestingly enough, however, the Times, which carried the anti-Gallup ad, failed to mention the Iconoclast's religious and racist heritage. Local Baptists might suspect a coverup.

As its Web site reports, the paper takes its name from a Waco publication founded in the 1890s by William Cowper Brann, "one of the most intriguing writers of his era." Brann is also highly admired by another good liberal, Texas columnist Molly Ivins, who invokes Brann from time to time, especially when flogging Baptists and other religious types.

In one column, for instance, Ms. Ivins found it "a shame we have no William Brann or H.L. Mencken around to mock some of the more patent idiocies advanced in the name of organized religion." In another she noted, somewhat mockingly, that "Fundamentalist Christian missionaries are now salivating over the prospect of going to Iraq to convert the hapless heathen. This is guaranteed to make America as popular as the clap in the region. The Southern Baptists are poised to deploy en masse, reminding us of Texas newspaperman William Brann's famous comment, 'The trouble with our Texas Baptists is that we do not hold them under water long enough.' "





Ms. Ivins typically refers to Brann as a "populist." But he was much more than that. He was as vicious a race-baiter as ever walked the Earth. In an essay titled "Beans and Blood," for instance, Brann attacked Bostonians who have had the temerity to suggest that blacks are "beings born in the image of God" and entitled to a fair trial. The Bostonians had been outraged over a spate of public burnings of black rape suspects.
Brann argued that the Yankees knew blacks only from a distance and were therefore unaware they have "no more conception of morality than a hyena." Indeed, he added, "you can no more educate honor and chastity into a c--- than into a brindle cat." The "civilization of the black man, such as it is, is due to his enslavement by a superior race."

Brann and his fellow superiors, he said, had tried due process of law on the "lecherous devils 'born in the image' of Boston's deity." They had shot them, sent them to the gallows, "flayed them alive, and all without effect. Having found the law a failure and respectable lynching futile, we have begun to kerosene 'em and set 'em on fire." Other passages simply cannot be printed in this newspaper.

Brann's ferocity places him in an elite class of especially toxic racists, and Ms. Ivins is forgiving a great deal to invoke and indeed praise him. One senses that his saving grace is a shared and abiding prejudice against traditional believers, one that is quite respectable in the circles Ms. Ivins runs in.

Brann brought an equal fervor to his Baptist-baiting. In one of his milder columns, he noted: "One cannot write philosophic essays while dallying with the Baptist faith. It were too much like mixing Websterian dignity with a cataleptoid convulsion or sitting on a red ant hill and trying to look unconcerned."

His attacks were so persistent that eventually a group of students from Baylor, the nearby Baptist school, abducted him. He survived that ordeal but his luck ran out after another Baylor partisan, Tom Davis, challenged him to a duel, which transpired on the streets of Waco. On the fateful day, both men fired, both men fell and both men died. One lives on, thanks to his latter-day fans.

Mr. Shiflett is a free-lance writer and member of the White House Writers Group.


65 posted on 10/02/2004 10:39:49 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eva

I was aware of the origin of the Iconoclast's name, although I always thought it was a little goofy for a small town newspaper. I wasn't aware of the radical nature of the original publication. Thanks for the information.


66 posted on 10/02/2004 11:09:57 PM PDT by Richard Kimball (Kerry Campaign: An army of pompous phrases moving across the landscape in search of an idea)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball
Thanks for posting this. It confirms what I already suspected.

Something doesn't make sense though. You said "It genuinely hurt the staff that one story turned the town so strongly against them."

How could they be so out of touch with the citizens they are writing stories and columns about each week that they were surprised by the reaction?

67 posted on 10/03/2004 8:16:54 AM PDT by Balding_Eagle (Liberalism has developed a dangerous neurosis that threatens this nations security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball

Bump for an excellent post...and a vanity at that.


68 posted on 10/03/2004 8:21:41 AM PDT by aBootes (Wake me up when a liberal has an original idea that does NOT involve raising taxes -- gunnygail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball

it doesn't seem like it would be to hard to roundup the 900 some residents of this town to protest the newspaper office. and demand a editoral change, by protesting and cancelling subscriptions.

somone should volunteer to round up as many as possible for a statement against the paper.


69 posted on 10/03/2004 8:26:35 AM PDT by wvromania (CHALLENGE KERRY to release DATE and TIME he Visited Troops at hospital!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle
A couple of things surprised everyone. I'm not sure anyone expected the endorsement to receive the level of national response that it did. They expected a firecracker of response. They got a stick of dynamite.

Small towns are kind of like the Las Vegas commercials, "what happens here, stays here." Nobody in town is going to get upset if someone else is voting for John Kerry, and that wasn't the real issue. In the paper, they attacked Bush pretty soundly, and that didn't go over well, but the real anger was over the national implication that the town endorsed Bush.

70 posted on 10/03/2004 9:57:09 AM PDT by Richard Kimball (Kerry Campaign: An army of pompous phrases moving across the landscape in search of an idea)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: wireplay

"Go Bulldogs!"

are you from McGregor?


71 posted on 10/03/2004 10:06:59 AM PDT by N8VTXNinWV (God Bless GWBush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball

bump


72 posted on 10/03/2004 10:09:46 AM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball
Shortly after the Democrats began their drive to unseat George Bush, a group came to town and bought an old house. They called it the Crawford Peace House. The house serves as a meeting place for people who want to have demonstrations and parades against the President....

None of the people associated with the Peace House are residents of Crawford, and all they really bring to the area are headaches. From my perspective, they're the same bunch of sixties radicals who now use bandanas to cover up bald spots and haven't done anything since 1967 except look for things to protest and a camera to photograph them doing it.

Heh-heh...

I for one look forward to your accomodating these career sh*t-stirrers when you snap a lovely gallery of pics taken at the gallows ;-)

73 posted on 10/03/2004 10:13:20 AM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball

This was a great story of Americana.
I loved the pictures, and it took me back to my youth in football crazy Ohio.
You should get this published in Townhall.


74 posted on 10/03/2004 10:21:15 AM PDT by mabelkitty (Do not indulge the Negative Nervous Nellies with reassurances.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball

bttt


75 posted on 10/03/2004 10:22:25 AM PDT by farmfriend ( In Essentials, Unity...In Non-Essentials, Liberty...In All Things, Charity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

Remember, she's someone's daughter, sister, future wife, and above all most likely, a child of God.


76 posted on 10/03/2004 10:50:32 AM PDT by freecopper01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball

Really nice story.
Sounds like you've found a nice place for a life.


77 posted on 10/03/2004 10:54:58 AM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freecopper01

She's also got a brother that was all-district last year, benches 350, and is playing fullback in college. He's very protective of his little sis.


78 posted on 10/03/2004 11:58:56 AM PDT by Richard Kimball (Kerry Campaign: An army of pompous phrases moving across the landscape in search of an idea)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: PokeyJoe
Thanks. When I wrote this, I was actually expecting about three responses and then for it to die a quiet death. Because the reaction was so positive from so many people, I posted it to my blog, here.

If anyone wants to use it or email it to someone, they're more than welcome.

79 posted on 10/03/2004 2:31:32 PM PDT by Richard Kimball (Kerry Campaign: An army of pompous phrases moving across the landscape in search of an idea)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget
LesbianThespian (love the handle) I agree with all that you say, my fear is that people will miss the point of the problem and Bush will lose because Congress if full of lilly livered pussies who give the Executive the power to declare war and then turn on them when the going gets tough.

In my opinion, this is the root cause of Somalia, Vietnam, Iraq and our weakening position overseas. It is the cause of the gradual rise of terror. Because we as a nation have not been forced, through the political processes the CONSTITUTION put in place, to form a collective backbone we are at the mercy of fragmented spineless partisans who could give a shit about this country and care only about playing to their respective politcal base. None of them are accountable, so we throw out Presidents and Congress gets to walk away clean.

Bush is in real danger of losing this race because people think he ALONE got us into this war. And wimps like Kerry can says idiotic things like, "I gave him the authority it's HIS fault that he used it and then f---ed it up." When as you know that is complete and utter BS. But he can get away with that line of weaselling because technically people can see it as true.

So, Bush could lose is my point because Congress will turn on him when the going gets tough in a war they gave him the authority to fight. The constitution had it right: LET CONGRESS DECLARE WAR, then you have the entire will of the American public behind you because Congress then cant go back to their consitutuents and then blame it anyone else.

This country is lost, imo, and I blame the War Powers Act. It's simplistic but Occam's razor, I say. The simplist answer in this case IS the answer.

By the way, it was the REPUBLICANS who got us OUT of Vietnam and the Democrats who not only got us in but lacked the political will to actually fight. How Nixon got the bum rap on losing Vietnam is completely beyond me. It was Lydon Baines Johnson and his administration who lost that war and such "useful idiots" as John Kerry who just helped them along.

The left loves failure. The only reason they are so intent on winning this election is so that they can make SURE America fails in Iraq. Why do you think they are so in love with the UN?
80 posted on 10/03/2004 2:41:57 PM PDT by N. Beaujon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson