To: jrushing
There is a definite contradiction in this article.
They do not define "pollution." Naturally released chemicals do not logically fall under such a heading.
7 posted on
10/02/2004 10:06:11 PM PDT by
Restorer
To: farmfriend
To: Restorer
Re: Naturally released chemicals
Explain your point. I'm having trouble understanding.
9 posted on
10/02/2004 10:15:16 PM PDT by
endthematrix
(Bad news is good news for the Kerry campaign!)
To: Restorer
Although scientists knew that trees contribute substantial amounts of VOCs to the atmosphere, the rate of increase in recent decades was previously unrecognized.
"It's just one of those biological correlations," said Purves. "What you want is a fast-growing tree that doesn't produce a lot of VOCs, but that doesn't seem to exist."
11 posted on
10/02/2004 10:27:52 PM PDT by
jrushing
(Democrats=National Socialist Workers Party)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson