Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: flashbunny; Joe Brower; Squantos; Tijeras_Slim; Eaker; coloradan
Ah yes, the 'rats at the NYT would like any guns we are allowed to keep to be triple-locked in govt approved safes. Subject to govt inspection, of course. That will make them very useful when the glass crashes in at 3AM.

No thanks.


21 posted on 10/03/2004 7:50:32 AM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Travis McGee
Ah yes, the 'rats at the NYT would like any guns we are allowed to keep to be triple-locked in govt approved safes. Subject to govt inspection, of course. That will make them very useful when the glass crashes in at 3AM.

Of course, after gun locks are mandated, the NYT will push for off-site firearm storage since parents cannot be trusted to use the locks properly.

Off-site storage means you must store your firearm at a target range or other 'approved' facility. You may only retrieve your firearm with a valid permit and reason.

Locks are only an interim step and not 'logical'.

33 posted on 10/03/2004 10:23:44 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (9-11 is your Peace Dividend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson