When we start search for possibilities that fit a predefined template, then we've lost our momentum. If we can't prove that Kerry pulled out cheat cards for the debate, then we should drop it. There are plenty of issues with which we can trounce Kerry without resorting to convoluted theories of how he "could have" done it.
I would concur with that, especially since, as it stands, Kerry can be called a cheater, regardless, because he broke the rules, regardless, and it's left the way it is.
How do you know we can't? Because Fox is duplicitous?
There are plenty of issues with which we can trounce Kerry without resorting to convoluted theories of how he "could have" done it.
Why not cover them all? Not only do we got Kerry's paper story, now we got a story that the MSM might be covering it up! Perfect for the net, blogs and talk radio.
I say keep hitting Kerry over the head with this. Sure some of these theories are wild but the funnier it seems, the more it makes it a target for late night talk show hosts to make jokes about it as the next debate looms.
How long did we have to endure the left spinning wild tales of how the forged Bush National Guard memos could be "real"? For a week with all of the journalists following the CBS/USA Today/AP lead.