Posted on 10/04/2004 3:41:41 PM PDT by NoobRep
Kerry Accuses GOP of Suppressing Voting
1 hour, 13 minutes ago
By MARY DALRYMPLE, Associated Press Writer
CLEVELAND - Republicans have been trying to suppress voting in states where the presidential race is too close to call, Democratic nominee John Kerry (news - web sites) said Sunday at one of the city's largest predominantly black churches.
"In battleground states across the country, we're hearing stories of how people are trying to make it harder to file for additional time, or how they're making it harder to even register," Kerry told an enthusiastic congregation at East Mt. Zion Baptist Church.
"We're not going to let that happen because the memories of 2000 are too strong. We're not going to allow 1 million African Americans to be disenfranchised."
At a stop in Ohio earlier Sunday, Kerry told a voter concerned about ballots cast by military personnel overseas that Democrats are aware of voting problems and are concerned.
"We're seeing efforts by the Republicans, unfortunately, in various parts of the country to suppress votes and intimidate people, to do things that bring back memories that are pretty bitter in the American mind from the year 2000."
With just a month left in the presidential campaign, Kerry said the campaign would take steps nationally to ensure voters access to the ballot box.
The Bush-Cheney campaign said the charges of voter suppression "have no basis in reality."
"Like so much of his campaign, John Kerry's false charges of voter intimidation are baseless," said spokesman Steve Schmidt. He said Democrats rejected a GOP offer to put a lawyer from each party in every voting district across the nation on Election Day.
Kerry said he has his own team of lawyers "of all color and all mix" examining possible voting problems to try to prevent a repeat of the 2000 election disputes. He also has said he has thousands of lawyers around the country prepared to monitor the polls on Nov. 2.
The Massachusetts senator has been fighting hard to win a number of closely divided states with enough Electoral College (news - web sites) votes at stake to swing the election, leading both campaigns to put legal teams in place ready to challenge voting irregularities.
To prevent Ohio from becoming this election's Florida, Democratic Rep. Stephanie Tubbs Jones (news, bio, voting record) gave the churchgoers some advice.
"When you go to the ballot box, if you make a mistake you can get another ballot," she said. She also urged voters with punch card ballots to hold them up for examination before turning them in.
"No hanging chads will mess with this election," she said.
They tell these outrageous lies and you can hardly hear the Republicans peeping, "no basis in reality." I'm sorry but that response is way too prissy.
How is this jerk allowed to talk politics in a church? Where are separation of church and state crowd - Hmmm?
now mr. kerry, please tell the congregation how many african americans you have on staff? and i dont mean your lily white wife!
now mr. kerry, please tell the congregation how many african americans you have on staff? and i dont mean your lily white wife!
Does anyone here have an email addy or a phone number for the Kerry campaign. I've had it.
Ive been thinking about this a lot lately. The democrats aren't lying to appease their constituents, they're lying to justify and incite misbehavior from their supporters. If the massive attempts at voter registration fraud are any indication, they're being quite successful.
My tactic for getting leftists to instantly STFU on this issue is to demand that they name names. Name ONE black who was disenfranchised! Name ONE Republican who did the disenfranchising! Name ONE court case that came to this determination!
When they can't respond, I call them baldfaced liars and traitors. You should see the looks of seething hatred on their faces!
My goal is to give at least one leftist an aneurysm before the election.
Amen!! What we need here is a Harry Truman or Andy Jackson. A politican who isn't afraid to loosen his tie take his jacket off and roll up his sleeves!
I agree. This is scurrilous and lying race-baiting, and the RNC should be merciless in denouncing this demagoguery.
Thanks.
Well, I went to my county's Republican breakfast Sat. AM at IHOP and got a yard sign and bumper stickers and we had two wonderful black men in attendance. One young guy said he had been away at college and when finished he would be buying a home in my county where his Dad lived. Great stuff considering Fayette is the most Republican county in GA. Afterwards I'm standing in the parking lot with my sign talking to a friend when this black guy comes walking by and says " He's gonna lose man" I just looked at him and said " Keep on dreaming brother." This guy was obviously from the next county North which has been taken over since I grew up there. Kool-Aid abounds around Atlanta. But there is hope.
Does this guy use a dart board for these numbers?
And if this audience is dumb enough to buy this BS, they don't deserve to vote.
How does this fool think he can govern, if by some weird circumstance he is elected, when he has insulted and demeaned fifty percent of the electorate? I suppose he will call for national unity and forgiveness like the old media does after their orgy and the election is over.
Many dems think they are entitled to vote twice and object that an effort to prevent double voting is an effort to "suppress" their vote.
Actually, I think the double voting is a little unfair. I also think the practice in Illinois of counting votes cast in these overwhelming dem precincts by surrogates for deceased voters is also unfair.
And then whine that everyone hates him.... or else put us all in re-education camps.
When is the Bush camp going to call him on this?
This is the excuse they will use (intimidation charges) when they try to throw out the Poll Watchers or other observers. Its not even race baiting; its all about the planned fraud.
This shows how silly and dangerous the mainstream media is. Kerry's makes an outrageous statement and its taken at face value. For example, Where in God's name did he get that million person figure??
This is just cover for the massive vote fraud the Almagamated Crooks and Liars have planned.
Send this out to EVERYONE on your mailing list.
October 15, 2003, 8:22 a.m.
The Florida Myth
An urban legend to fire up the base.
By Peter Kirsanow
Political myths can overcome facts through sheer repetition: The New Deal ended the Depression, tax cuts caused budget deficits in the Eighties, etc. These myths serve vital partisan imperatives especially when the policy cupboards of the partisans are bare or vermin-infested.
One of the myths already resurrected for the 2004 presidential election cycle is that blacks in Florida were systematically harassed, intimidated, and prevented from voting in the 2000 presidential election < the "stolen" election.
Even before the last vote had been cast, activists had descended upon Florida, claiming a widespread conspiracy to disenfranchise black voters. Allegations that state troopers put up roadblocks and checkpoints to prevent blacks from voting were rampant. Dogs and hoses were allegedly used to drive black voters from the polls. Bull Connor's heirs had been unleashed < all at the direction of Governor Bush and his sidekick, Secretary of State Katherine Harris.
The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights investigated these allegations over a six-month period beginning in January 2001. Its 200-page majority report, Voting Irregularities in Florida During the 2000 Presidential Election, excoriates Florida's election officials for various acts of misfeasance. But the conclusions drawn by the report often bore little relationship to the facts contained therein. And media descriptions of the report did little to dispel the widespread belief among the black electorate that blacks had been systematically targeted for harassment, intimidation, and disenfranchisement.
Of course, almost no one actually read the report. But the handful that did (especially the incisive dissent authored by Commissioners Abigail Thernstrom and Russell Redenbaugh) discovered the astonishing mendacity underlying the myth.
There's absolutely no evidence that a single person was intimidated, harassed, or prevented from voting by Florida law-enforcement officials.
Despite claims of rampant police intimidation and harassment, the only evidence of law-enforcement "misconduct" consisted of just two witnesses who described their perceptions of the actions of the Florida highway patrol. One of these witnesses testified that he thought it was "unusual" to see an empty patrol car parked outside a polling place. There was no evidence that sight of the vehicle somehow intimidated the witness or any other voters from casting ballots. There was no evidence that the erstwhile occupant of the vehicle harassed voters. There was no evidence that the empty vehicle was there for the purpose of somehow disenfranchising anyone assigned to vote at that location.
The second witness had filed a highly publicized complaint with the NAACP regarding a police motor-vehicle checkpoint. In the hysterical recount period following the election, the complaint took on a life of its own and apparently became part of the basis for the legend that legions of cops were harassing thousands of black voters throughout Florida.
The evidence, however, shows that the checkpoint in question was two miles from the polling place. Moreover, it was not even on the same road as the polling facility. During the checkpoint's approximately 90 minutes of operation, citations for faulty equipment were issued to 16 individuals, twelve of whom were white. The incontrovertible evidence shows that no one was delayed or prohibited from voting due to the lone checkpoint.
There's no evidence of systematic disenfranchisement of black voters.
The myth of a nefarious plot to thwart black voters from casting ballots is wholly unsupported by the evidence. Inconvenience, bureaucratic errors, and inefficiencies were indeed pervasive. But these problems don't rise to the level of invidious discrimination. (There was one case in which a black woman alleged that she was turned away from a poll at closing time whereas a white man wasn't.)
Much has been made of the "felon purge list," i.e., a list of those individuals who, under Florida law, were to be barred from voting due to felony convictions. The list had been prepared to prevent the kind of fraud that had occurred in the infamous Miami mayoral election, in which a number of ineligible felons voted.
The list was inaccurate; it included people who shouldn't have been on it. Thus, the myth holds that the purge list was somehow a tool to deny blacks the right to vote.
But facts are stubborn things. Whites were actually twice as likely as blacks to be erroneously placed on the list. In fact, an exhaustive study by the Miami Herald concluded that "the biggest problem with the felon list was not that it prevented eligible voters from casting ballots, but that it ended up allowing ineligible voters to cast a ballot."* According to the Palm Beach Post, more than 6,500 ineligible felons voted.
State officials were not at fault for widespread voter "disenfranchisement."
The myth holds that Governor Bush, in league with Secretary of State Katherine Harris, either by design or incompetence, failed to fulfill their electoral responsibilities, resulting in the discriminatory disenfranchisement of thousands of black voters. This was purportedly a key to the overarching Republican plot to steal the election from Al Gore.
Again, reality intrudes. The incontrovertible evidence shows that by statute the responsibility for the conduct of elections is in the hands of county supervisors, not the governor or secretary of state. County supervisors are independent officers answerable to county commissioners, not the governor or secretary of state. And in 24 of the
25 counties that had the highest ballot-spoilage rates, the county supervisor was a Democrat. (In the remaining county the supervisor was not a Republican, but an independent.)
Moreover, as is simply put by Commissioner Thernstrom, voter error is not the same thing as "disenfranchisement." Even if more black voters than white voters spoiled their ballots by mistake, that's not evidence of a scheme to discriminate on the basis of race, and it certainly doesn't evoke images of dogs and fire hoses.
After issuance of the commission's report, some diehards, perhaps realizing that history frowns on demagoguery, desperately sought any facts that might support the myth. The Justice Department was pressed for action, and conducted a thorough investigation. The result: The Civil Rights Division found no credible evidence in our investigation that Floridians were intentionally denied their right to vote during the November 2000 election.
The Justice Department did find violations of the Voting Rights Act in three counties. The infractions were that some poll workers had been hostile to Hispanic voters, bilingual assistance hadn't been provided to two Haitian voters, and some Hispanic voters had been denied bilingual assistance. None of the offending counties was controlled by Republicans.
Of course, there's a reason why charges of disenfranchisement have great traction among the black electorate. After all, the Voting Rights Act wasn't simply a piece of feel-good legislation. Poll taxes, literacy tests, and worse remain vivid memories for far too many.
That's precisely why baseless claims of voter harassment on the basis of race are particularly odious. They inflame racial tensions by perpetuating a belief that the shameful practices of two generations past continue unabated < that a virulently racist hegemony is forever poised to subjugate minorities.
The consequences of generating suspicion of the electoral process for the sake of partisan advantage are at once insidious and profound. They dangerously undermine the legitimacy of government and encourage rejection of its authority.
The myth is poisonous to society and democracy. Its antidote is a relentless, adamant repetition of the truth.
Peter Kirsanow is a member of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.