1 posted on
10/04/2004 6:00:46 PM PDT by
Dubya
To: Dubya
Horrible that people are required to work! Horrible! What is this country coming to!
To: Dubya
Obviously, no one opposes work," says Kate Walz, a lawyer at the Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law in Chicago. "But the concern is that we'll have these model, mixed-income developments, with a lot of resources and access to public transportation and new schools, while all families ineligible will be pushed out to the same old public-housing developments, so nothing will have changed."
No one's ineligible. You sign up, you're in. You just gotta do something they tell you up-front you have to do.
4 posted on
10/04/2004 6:04:52 PM PDT by
Xenalyte
(And then I says, "Tell me I'm wrong!" and he says, "I can't, baby, 'cause you're NOT!")
To: All
"Obviously, no one opposes work," says Kate Walz, a lawyer at the Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law in Chicago.LOL
5 posted on
10/04/2004 6:05:03 PM PDT by
Dubya
(Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father,but by me)
To: All
Not everything is set in stone, he notes. Heads of household, for instance, will have a 12-month grace period in which they can look for work or attend job training. This is really being tough on them.
8 posted on
10/04/2004 6:07:40 PM PDT by
Dubya
(Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father,but by me)
To: Dubya
If someone were to ever invent a kitchen utensil that would get the last ounce of peanut butter out of the jar, hunger in America would be eradicated.
11 posted on
10/04/2004 6:11:24 PM PDT by
Old Professer
(Fear is the fountain of hostility.)
To: Dubya
"Among other things, heads of household will have to work 30 hours a week."
Chicago is obviously run by fascist Republicans. </DU>
12 posted on
10/04/2004 6:14:07 PM PDT by
CzarNicky
(The problem with bad ideas is that they seemed like good ideas at the time.)
To: Dubya
"mixed-income housing" is a failure. It doesn't work. It's complete nonsense that only works in the twisted minds of delusional left-wing Utopists. I say: eliminate public housing a free the market. Why should WE subsidize a roof for people we don't know and ESPECIALLY don't care about? I work hard to pay my rent. I work hard to pay my food. Why should my money subsidize people that don't work and have decided too many children?
15 posted on
10/04/2004 6:26:47 PM PDT by
Kurt_D
To: Dubya
Looks like they are finally trying to do what works.
It never made sence to have "low income housing projects" where everyone in a large neighborhood area is "underpriviledged" and on government assistance.
How can anyone learn anything except living in poverty and how to milk more from assistance programs in that environment?
17 posted on
10/04/2004 6:32:45 PM PDT by
sarasmom
To: Dubya
Among other things, heads of household will have to work 30 hours a week. All other adults over 18 must either work or attend self-sufficiency, education, or basic-skills programs for 30 hours a week.That's pretty much a law of nature --- too bad the government got so involved in the first place and taught people dependence --- now the government has to tell them to work. Just end the handouts and they'll figure it out.
24 posted on
10/04/2004 10:05:58 PM PDT by
FITZ
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson