Skip to comments.
Reporters Saw Bush as Debate Winner,
But Swayed by Media Line
Media Research Center ^
| October 6, 2004
Posted on 10/06/2004 11:18:49 PM PDT by kingattax
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 last
To: The Old Hoosier
I thought the President was whipped by style but not by substance. He abounded in that. I find it surprising that Gregory had the eyes to see it. Evan Thomas doesn't surprise me because he's more open-minded.
41
posted on
10/07/2004 12:43:48 PM PDT
by
twigs
To: kingattax
We are voting on our Cammander-in-chief........not the best debater........heck, even I can out talk that "kept man" Kerry!
To: kayak
Lemmings off a cliff. Talk about peer pressure, they're like a group of teenagers, someone might say something that is out of line, and wow, like, no more dinner invitations to Sally Quinn's house. Argh.
To: kingattax
If substance meant anything then W won going away. Yaaawn flapped his lips and said nothing. When W gives a decent presentation and good command of the subject than the Mediots will look like fools. They will flex their weakened muscles again though.
Pray for W and Our Troops
44
posted on
10/07/2004 9:34:49 PM PDT
by
bray
(Hey Dingbat, how do you say Tax-Evasion in Portugese???)
To: kingattax
Bush won hands down on substance. Unfortunetly, the mindless masses cannot think for themselves and a great number actually believe the BS spewed by the DNC shills, aka journalists.
45
posted on
10/07/2004 9:38:38 PM PDT
by
dougherty
(I saw the angel in the marble and carved until I set him free. - Michelangelo)
To: dougherty
unfortunetly = unfortunately
46
posted on
10/07/2004 9:40:31 PM PDT
by
dougherty
(I saw the angel in the marble and carved until I set him free. - Michelangelo)
To: kingattax
Not just RATS. Good Republicans gave in to worry and handwringing and did real damage by their wailing and gnashing needlessly.
The focus should have been, and hopefully from this point forward will be, to support our man completely and focus on the content of what was said.
Bush did indeed win.
47
posted on
10/07/2004 9:42:33 PM PDT
by
cyncooper
(Have I mentioned lately that I despise the media?)
To: cyncooper
the RATS are always in lock step..... they are NEVER
inconvenienced by the truth.
48
posted on
10/07/2004 9:58:09 PM PDT
by
kingattax
(FreeRepublic leads...others follow)
To: nutmeg
49
posted on
10/07/2004 9:59:07 PM PDT
by
nutmeg
("The DemocRATic party...has been hijacked by a confederacy of gangsters..." - Pat Caddell, 11/27/00)
To: kingattax
Who won the debate? Well, any of you see any DNC ads exploiting something Dubya said? On the other hand, do the words Global Test mean anything to you?
50
posted on
10/07/2004 10:07:25 PM PDT
by
McGavin999
(If Kerry can't deal with the "Republican Attack Machine" how is he going to deal with Al Qaeda)
To: kingattax
51
posted on
10/08/2004 6:21:53 AM PDT
by
EllaMinnow
(Dan would RATHER lie.)
To: kingattax
Does anyone still harbor any hope that, regardless of the performance, the MSM would admit that a Republican won a debate? Anyone?
52
posted on
10/08/2004 6:24:55 AM PDT
by
jackbill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson