Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: soccer4life

I believe Badnarik and the Constitution Party both have a legitimate place in the debates. As for the Green Party guy without Nader, I doubt he's on enough ballots to get 270 electoral votes.


11 posted on 10/08/2004 10:09:49 PM PDT by Keyes2000mt (John Kerry: The Wrong Candidate, for the Wrong Office, at the Wrong Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Keyes2000mt

If Nader isn't legitimate, the rest of the third parties aren't either. To be on the debates, candidates must be polling higher than 15%.


13 posted on 10/08/2004 10:34:41 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (Real gun control is - all shots inside the ten ring)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Keyes2000mt
I believe Badnarik and the Constitution Party both have a legitimate place in the debates.

Agreed. I was disappointed to hear that they were banned. Wonder who made that rule? Americans have the right to hear what third party candidates have to say. Banning them from debating is unfair. Are the "two party" candidates afraid of what they might say?

14 posted on 10/08/2004 10:34:44 PM PDT by janetgreen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Keyes2000mt

I like the idea of having a minimum threshold in polling for participation.

How else can you limit the debates to any number?


22 posted on 10/08/2004 11:07:09 PM PDT by CyberCowboy777 (We want hard, tough, seasoned leaders who will methodically destroy the people who would kill us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson