[AmishDude]

I know. I know they can air what they want. The problem is that this escalates things. Guaranteed next election a liberal broadcast group will do the same thing with a program much less truthful. You also have that the FCC will be awakened to this.

Moreover this is an attack that is not related to issues but is personal against a presidential candidate's character and activities. Maybe it's just that it's an unorthodox format. If it were part of a newsmagazine or news broadcast, it would be a little less conspicuous.

Again, if this were purchased as an infomercial, I have no objections at all. Even this way, I can only say I'm disappointed.

[holymoly]

The problem is that this escalates things.

No, it is SAUCE FOR THE GOOSE.

Guaranteed next election a liberal broadcast group will do the same thing with a program much less truthful.

Oh, for the love of Pete. What do you think NBC, ABC, PBS, CBS (specifically Comrade Dan Rather/60 Minutes) et. al. have been doing for YEARS?

Moreover this is an attack that is not related to issues but is personal against a presidential candidate's character and activities.

A documentary about Kerrys' past activities is not a "personal attack", and while you may not consider his past activities to be relevant, many others do. The American public has a right to know what type of person John Kerry is, and Sinclair is doing a public service by airing ths documentary.

[FairOpinion]

Are they supposed to buy airtime from themselves?

As many point out, most of the TV stations have been engaging in nonstop Bush bashing for the past year and a half, and have you forgotten the CBS special with Dan Rather, based on fake memos attacking Bush's character?

And now you are whining, because someone dares to air a special, at their own expense, on their own stations, which shows the truth about Kerry?!

[A Jovial Cad]

Why are you disappointed?