Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Dick Dahl writes for Join Together which is an anti-rights group from Boston. Rebecca Peters is one of the most dangerous gun grabbers in the world. She was key in Australia's gun laws, went to work for George SOROS(Open Society is Soros's foundation), and now is with IANSA which is the international freedom grab lobby.

NRA's assertion that the UN is trying to regulate guns in the US through international treaties
NRA doesn't have to assert it. I posted much of the UN's plans here about 4 years ago. My source was the UN itself.

I know that you're right, that we should be tightening gun laws. But I'm afraid to do it.'"

Pols should be afraid to do it. Afraid of losing their JOBS like Eric Fingerhut(Ohio), Ma Richards, Jack Brooks(Texas), Al Gore, and Wyche Fowler(Georgia) did.

because they and the gun manufacturers who back them
BZZZZZZZZZZZZZz. Wrong answer. That's a VPC(funded by Soros) myth. The NRA is backed by people like me. I'm not the gun industry.

"In the U.S., the notion of having a gun because you might feel the need to kill someone is acceptable.

That's a loaded term. I shoot to kill turkeys. If I have to defend myself or others, I shoot to stop.

1 posted on 10/09/2004 7:32:51 PM PDT by Dan from Michigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Dan from Michigan
you might feel the need to kill someone...

Who's broken into your house at 3am....IS acceptable. He's not there to cook me breakfast.

2 posted on 10/09/2004 7:37:10 PM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan

Lefties always prefer unarmed peasants...


5 posted on 10/09/2004 7:53:06 PM PDT by GW and Twins Pawpaw (Sheepdog for Five [my grandkids are way more important than any liberal's feelings!])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan

500,000 people worldwide are killed by small guns... only 30,000 in the US per year according to hcinc... less than 10% in the good ole armed usa... could it be because we are the best armed against attacking marauders...

\preaching to the choir mode

teeman


6 posted on 10/09/2004 8:02:53 PM PDT by teeman8r (after the shiite hits the fan, no sense worrying about the stink... time to clean up the un et al)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan

Read the above column and replace the phrase "private gun ownership" with "private automobile ownership"" and set back and hear the howl from the public. Automobiles kill and maim millions each year but nobody (except a few Greens) want to ban private ownership of cars.

The Constitution doesn't specifically protect owning cars as it does guns.

Remember, its all about FREEDOM


7 posted on 10/09/2004 8:10:38 PM PDT by RedMonqey (Keep RIGHT or get LEFT behind!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan
Peters says. "In the U.S., the notion of having a gun because you might feel the need to kill someone is acceptable.

I get so tired of the leftists' cheap rhetoric. If you simply want to live in peace and not be a victim, the socialists make it sound like something sinister and anti-social. If, on the other hand, you are a violent criminal (or a dictator) and use guns against innocent people, the socialists will be full of sympathy for you if you are a violent criminal and they will admire you if you do really big crimes (including "gun crimes") and become a dictator.

8 posted on 10/09/2004 8:11:46 PM PDT by Wilhelm Tell (Lurking since 1997!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan
In those places, the focus is on achieving "basic measures to make sure that guns are only in the hands of people who are legally entitled to have them,

Like Britain? Where nobody is "entitled" to have them, but every criminal can get one? Where the chance of getting mugged in London is far higher than any major American city? Right.

9 posted on 10/09/2004 8:21:29 PM PDT by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan
What's the chatter on the LAST debate they did?

Is this a "pay per view" too ?

Does NRA and Join Together share the proceeds from this debate?

What was their "take" on the last one ?

How can we, in good conscience, participate in this debate, as a viewer, (Paying Viewer) when "any" part of our money may go to an Anti-Gun group to be used against us..??

11 posted on 10/10/2004 9:09:01 PM PDT by Drammach (Freedom; not just a job, it's an adventure..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson