Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Joe Republc
Pres. Bush continues to disappoint me in not articulating this important distinction, though I appreciate his support in the actual decisions.

I think Bush is trying to do everything he can to let Kerry paint himself negatively, while avoiding personally saying anything negative about him. I can understand why he's doing this, but at the same time I do wish someone would come out and ask what reason is there to believe that embryonic stem cells are likely to have any more promise than the adult-stem-cell therapies that are already showing results? I can think of some reasons why people might favor embryonic stem cell research, but none of them are morally good.

19 posted on 10/09/2004 11:53:19 PM PDT by supercat (If Kerry becomes President, nothing bad will happen for which he won't have an excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: supercat
All I ask for is for the researchers to learn to crawl before they try to run. What I see is a bunch of glory hounds seeking research money from the tax payer. Just think of it, an open field of research and more money than you can think of. If you need a view recall a woman in Canada who took the first x ray photo of DNA. Some men who built tinker toys saw the photo and got the big prize and glory. The excuse that these cell are just over there and are going to be tossed reminds me of a German Dr who liked to test twins. Paging Dr Mengile (sp).
23 posted on 10/10/2004 1:14:54 AM PDT by Domangart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson