[pabianice]

This is the second Times article in a week to accurately portray Kerry as a dangerous *ssh*le. What's going on over there?

[libs_kma]

I think whats going on is NYT is subtley clicking into Clintonista mode. I think they are looking at Kerry and knowing that this guy will set DNC back for years and years and they are doing what they can to cut and run and Jus Wait for Zero Eight"

[libstripper]

There's also a "Newsweek" article, posted about half way through last week (I'm posting on 10/11), about a major Kerry donor being on the take with Saddam's oil for food scam to the tune of about 22 million $$. In addition, just before Bill Clinton went under the knife he gave Kerry a 45 minute "confidential" lecture on proper campaigning, which Clinton's shills promptly leaked to the press.

None of this derogatory material about Kerry would have been printed in the liberal DemonRat press without the Clintons' approval. The NYT article would have simply ignored the "nuisance" quote the way the NYT ignored the Swiftvets unless NYT management had received the word to release it. The Clintons have switched their phasers from stun to kill and are firing them at the heart of the Kerry campaign. If this doesn't work, they'll probably leak his complete military files abot a week before the election.