Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Growing threat' of bio-attack on coalition in Iraq
Straits Times ^ | 10/11/04

Posted on 10/10/2004 5:34:27 PM PDT by mylife

Growing threat' of bio-attack on coalition in Iraq

CIA warns of insurgents' plans for germ warfare

WASHINGTON - Insurgent networks across Iraq are increasingly trying to acquire and use toxic nerve gases, blister agents and germ weapons against coalition forces, the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) says.

Investigators said one group recruited scientists and sought to prepare poisons over seven months, before being dismantled in June.

US officials say the threat is especially worrisome as leaders of the previously unknown group, which investigators dubbed the 'Al Abud network', were based in Fallujah in proximity to insurgents aligned with fugitive militant Abu Musab al Zarqawi.

The CIA says Zarqawi, who is blamed for numerous attacks on US forces and beheadings of hostages, has long sought to use chemical and biological weapons against targets in Europe as well as Iraq.

An exhaustive report released last week by Mr Charles Duelfer, the CIA's chief weapons investigator in Iraq, concluded that Saddam Hussein destroyed his stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons in the early 1990s and never tried to rebuild them.

But a little-noticed section of the 960-page report warns that the danger of a 'devastating' attack with unconventional weapons has grown since the US-led invasion and occupation of Iraq last year.

Neither of the two Al Abud chemists had any ties to Saddam's long-defunct weapons programmes, and Mr Duelfer's investigators found no evidence that the group's poison project was part of a 'prescribed plan by the former regime to fuel an insurgency'.

The leaders and financiers of the network 'remain at large, and alleged chemical munitions remain unaccounted' for, the report said.

It added that other insurgent groups are 'planning or attempting to produce or acquire' chemical and biological agents throughout Iraq, and warns that the availability of chemicals and munitions, as well as sympathetic former Iraqi weapons scientists, 'increases the future threat'.

The new discoveries are separate from several attacks this year involving chemical munitions, the report said.

In May and June, insurgents used chemical-filled artillery shells, left over from Iraq's pre-1991 stocks, in three roadside bombs. Partly because of the shells' age, no chemical injuries were reported.

In all, US forces have recovered 53 decaying chemical-filled shells or artillery rockets that apparently were looted from unguarded ammunition bunkers or other sites.

Investigators from Mr Duelfer's Iraq Survey Group learned of the Al Abud threat by chance in March, when a US Army patrol raided a laboratory in a Baghdad market known for chemical supply shops.

They discovered an Iraqi chemist who had successfully produced small quantities of ricin, a potentially deadly toxin made from castor beans.

After the chemist was interrogated, Mr Duelfer quickly created a special team of covert agents, analysts and weapons experts to track down the scientist's contacts and arrest other members of the Al Abud network, named for the laboratory where the chemist was found.

By June, the team was able to identify and 'neutralise' the group's chemists, chemical suppliers, and other members of the network.

A series of raids, interrogations and detentions 'disrupted key activities at Al Abud-related laboratories, safe houses, supply stores' and organisational centres, according to Mr Duelfer's report.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bio; iraq
Didnt see this posted
1 posted on 10/10/2004 5:34:28 PM PDT by mylife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mylife

Hmm.. wonder where they got 'em


2 posted on 10/10/2004 5:35:19 PM PDT by Lunatic Fringe (http://www.drunkenbuffoonery.com/mboards/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe
Growing threat' of bio-attack on coalition in Iraq

Surely,.....not via French/Canadian/British corporations of 'flu' vaccines.....etc.

.................'They' would NEVER do 'that'........

(Mystery 'ship' lady found 'head-dead' in British 'lab'....street?)

naw

3 posted on 10/10/2004 5:39:19 PM PDT by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: maestro

>>Mystery 'ship' lady found 'head-dead' in British 'lab'....street?)<<

Could you explain this, please?


4 posted on 10/10/2004 5:41:01 PM PDT by netmilsmom (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mylife

I thought there were no wmd's . oops silly me .


5 posted on 10/10/2004 5:43:02 PM PDT by pipecorp ("never know where you're going till you get there." the philosopher Insectus Harem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
'Not I'............Alice

/sarcasm

6 posted on 10/10/2004 5:45:58 PM PDT by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mylife
> toxic nerve gases, blister agents and germ weapons

I thought those were considered "weapons of mass destruction." There AREN'T any WMD in Iraq -- I know that because AWC&GC Kerry told me so.....

7 posted on 10/10/2004 5:48:30 PM PDT by NewJerseyJoe (Rat mantra: "Facts are meaningless! You can use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife

If this proves out; its time to "BUFF Up OUR TACTICAL NUKES!


8 posted on 10/10/2004 5:50:14 PM PDT by winker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife

This would be a big worry. Such attacks would not be specific to the Green Zone even if that were the primary target, but would hit all without checking their religious or political affiliation.


9 posted on 10/10/2004 5:50:19 PM PDT by RightWhale (Withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty and establish property rights)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe

I have no doubt that they are there.

Though the storys headline is probably hype.

Our troops have been at risk all along


10 posted on 10/10/2004 5:51:02 PM PDT by mylife (Opinions~$1.00 Todays Special: Halfbaked~50. cents)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe
Hmm.. wonder where they got 'em

It's no big deal.
Right after 9-11, I saw a TV news report regarding how one of our guvmint agencies
did start wondering about how easy it would be for evil-doers to get at least
some biological weapons going.

IIRC, with about a million dollars, a small group of US researchers found that they
could buy OFF THE SHELF parts to build a bio-reactor for churning out liters of
nasty sh-t. This is mostly due to the "biotech" revolution of the past
two decades.

The "nuts-'n-bolts" of what Saddam wanted to do...could easily be done on a smaller
scale by some smart folks (maybe bacherlor of science grads?) with enough money.

All they'd need to do is get some "starter" from a university/research lab
and figure out how to deliver it.

So what if someone builds a barnyard bio-reactor and only kills, oh, 10,000 people
(not 100,000 like Saddam would try for). It would still be a catastrophy for our
"boots on the ground".
11 posted on 10/10/2004 5:56:46 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mylife

mylife wrote - Our troops have been at risk all along.

That is very true. It's almost amazing there hasn't been any chemical attacks at least to date.

And Zarqawi already knows how to make them himself. He doesn't need any scientists help other than to maybe procur supplies for him or to develop some of the really serious chems like VX.


12 posted on 10/10/2004 5:57:28 PM PDT by JustDoItAlways
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mylife
As soon as such an attack happens, there will be a fierce counterattack by our forces. And as soon as that happens, the left will fracture into three screaming sections. One will insist that there were no chem/bio weapons at all, and that the story was a fake to give cover for genocide by American soldiers. Another will insist that the chem/bio weapons are real, but were planted by the operatives of the Bush administration to provide an "October Surprise." And the third will blame President Bush for the whole thing, argueing that Saddam Hussein had no WMD's before the our attack in the spring of 2003, and that if it weren't for that attack, no WMD's would have been brought into the Iraq by anyone.

(steely)

13 posted on 10/10/2004 6:00:15 PM PDT by Steely Tom (Fortunately, fhe Bill of Rights doesn't include the word 'is'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife

Wow, a bio attack would certainly be a "nuisance". If they do that, somebody is gonna get arrested!!! /sarcasm


14 posted on 10/10/2004 6:01:29 PM PDT by PilloryHillary (John Kerry is a traitor www.johnfkerrysucks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VOA

VOA wrote - The "nuts-'n-bolts" of what Saddam wanted to do...could easily be done on a smaller scale by some smart folks (maybe bacherlor of science grads?) with enough money.

What hasn't been talked about enought yet in my opinion is just that. It is one the main reasons we moved on Saddam. Technology and knowledge, especially biological, is spreading so fast around the world now, that we really need the whole world to democratize at a faster rate and get rid of these terrorists at a faster pace.

There is short timeline of perhaps only 15 years before every country on the planet needs to be run by people who can be trusted not to develop a nasty bio-weapon that escapes from a lab by accident or especially allows terrorists to get their hands on what-will-become-easy-to-produce WMD.


15 posted on 10/10/2004 6:03:14 PM PDT by JustDoItAlways
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JustDoItAlways
What hasn't been talked about enought yet in my opinion is just that. It is one the main
reasons we moved on Saddam.


One of the few things that I agree with that stinker Richard Clarke about is this:
It is shocking that there haven't been a spat of chem/bio/dirty-bomb attacks.
Right here in the U.S. of A.

I've been in academic/private-lab research for decades, sometimes with some nasty chemicals.
Given the number of researchers with access to nasty stuff and knowledge of what to
do with it...and the number of foreign students moving in/out of labs...
it's a freakin' miracle we haven't been hit multiple times here in the USA.

I've talked to an RSO (Radiation Safety Officer) at a major research university
and he says just about the same...
16 posted on 10/10/2004 6:15:27 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson