Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FourtySeven
most seem to come from the early 90's, which, at that time, no one (even the peace activists/Dems/traitors) denies Saddam had WMD's.

The thing that's more germane about the early 90's docs is that they demonstrate links to OBL.

48 posted on 10/11/2004 8:33:11 PM PDT by Dr. Frank fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: Dr. Frank fan

Also, just because CBS only has access to docs referencing the early 1990's doesn't mean our Gov't / Military intelligence doesn't have docs that indicate more current and/or more dangerous information.

I've always believed our intelligence services know 100 times more than what the MSM knows, and I want to keep it that way. When our President says we need to go to war because of intelligence info, I trust that he knows things I don't know. And I wouldn't have it any other way, despite the MSM's belief that they are entitled to know everything about everything.

And for the next debate, I WISH President Bush would state that every other intelligence agency in the world thought Saddam had WMD, not just ours. When he says "my opponent read the same intelligence I did and he thought Saddam had WMD" - I wish he would remind the TV audience that it wasn't JUST THE UNITED STATES (i.e., not just George W. Bush) who thought Saddam had WMD. No one can fault GWB specifically for the same intelligence all the other countries' intelligence agencies had.


52 posted on 10/11/2004 8:46:20 PM PDT by BagCamAddict (NEVER FORGET. THE THREAT IS REAL AND PRESENT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson