To: Restorer
No, in the Times article he said he wants to get back to they day when terrorism is a nuisance like gambling and prostitution.
Well, I'd like to go back to that time, too.
But we can't.
Exactly, we had an administration which did view terrorism as a nuisance and look what came from it. We should have never underestimated the evil of terrorism and the insidious nature of islamo-facism.
19 posted on
10/11/2004 8:25:19 AM PDT by
camboianchristmas
(when two or more or gathered in His name...great things happen)
To: camboianchristmas
Clinton viewed terrorism as a law enforcement issue, as will Kerry if elected, at least until after the first major attack on his watch.
Bush views them as acts of war and responds to them as such.
I'm not sure either paradigm is entirely correct. Perhaps we need a new and different way to respond to a new and different threat.
Instead of arguing about whether terrorism is A or B, perhaps we should consider the possibility that it is G.
26 posted on
10/11/2004 8:58:46 AM PDT by
Restorer
(Europe is heavily armed, but only with envy.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson