Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: z3n
In this case, why wouldn't a presidetial cadidate on the ballot be allowed to have a voice in a debate if there wasn't a two party collusion against it.

Because in the last election they only got 0.36 percent of the vote and polls show no improvement.

34 posted on 10/11/2004 5:31:04 PM PDT by WildTurkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: WildTurkey

If you can not see that the amount of covererage was quite close to the vote % they got, then you are missing half the point.

Have you seen super size me? It displays the path of the fools that eat nothing but junk food. Sure, we are free to do so, but the problem is that when we are dealing with the government, we are not just consuming things ourselves. We are consuming the life energy of others.

The Libertarians merely want to remove the yoke of big government from themselves and their fellow Liberty loving Americans. If you have a problem with a freedom fighter, you have a problem with freedom. (heck, Bush coulda said that one!!!)

So back off the LP no matter how small or large their vote count was.

BTW - Is the mention of the statisitc your way of saying you would jump on the LP.org bandwagon after fifty percent of America did? AND what is your take on the philosophy, not the voter record of America in the past.

THAT is the issue you should address.


220 posted on 10/11/2004 10:14:37 PM PDT by libertarianish (STOP charging me for your big government addiction, brothers and sisters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson