"Further, one has to wonder why ABC News will not address the serious questions as to why John Kerry only received an honorable discharge through the act of then President Carter, seven years after his discharge, and had to have all of his military citations reissued, on the same day, when he became a United States Senator in 1985. And, finally, why has Nightline found it of no interest to permit any POWs to come on their program to explain why they believe John Kerry betrayed their nation, caused them to be incarcerated for an additional two years and caused them tremendous additional hardship and suffering."
John O'Neill
"Further, one has to wonder why ABC News will not address the serious questions as to why John Kerry only received an honorable discharge through the act of then President Carter seven years after his discharge"
Seven years after his **release from active duty and transfer to the standby reserves**, not his "discharge," if the documents linked above are authentic. Sorry, but there's no 'there' there.
There are plenty of things of which Kerry is guilty
to bear down on. I wish people would drop this red herring.
It reminds me of when the Lewinsky thing was used to distract attention from Beelzebubba's real crimes.
Also, what documentation is there that Carter intervened personally on Kerry's behalf? (Not that I'd put it past the doddering old idiot.)
"and had to have all of his military citations reissued, on the same day,"
Admin stuff tends to get done in batches. Nature of the beast. Again, a "reissue" is only worthy of note if:
1. We want to say that the reason he needed them reissued was that he disrespectfully threw them away, which is not a crime; or
2. He improperly had one or more citations rewritten to make himself look better, which would be a crime.
"And, finally, why has Nightline found it of no interest"
Because they are a pack of despicable left-wing sleazebucket liars.